vol III: Development
chapter 4: Physics
page 5: Gravitation
Introduction
Here we take the view that gravitation is a quantum mechanical (ie computational) phenomenon which occurs prior to space-time and is fact responsible for the creation and annihilation of space-time. Einstein's general theory of relativity shows us in a kinematic way that the universe must either be expanding or contracting. Quantum mechanics adds the dynamics of the universal network to Einstein's kinematics. Misner, Thorne and Wheeler: Gravitation, pp 1203 sqq.
Aristotle and cosmology
Aristotle was one of the first thinkers to create a bridge between heaven and Earth, with his theory of potency and act. In the physical world, potency is matter, and act is form. Form informs matter to make it be what it is. The same bronze may be a sword or a ploughshare. Actus et potentia - Wikipedia, Hylomorphism - Wikipedia
Potency and act extended this idea of matter and form to the invisible world. Aristotle considered it axiomatic that no potency could actualize itself. From this he concluded that there must be a first unmoved mover which animates the world, since he understood motion to be the passage from potency to act. Aquinas used exactly the same argument in his first proof for the existence of God. Aquinas 13: Does God Exist?
Newton and gravitation
The next big link between the heavens and the earth came with Newton's theory of Universal gravitation and his application of this simple law to the movements of the planets and their satellites. Newton's law tells us that all mass points in the universe attract one another with a force which is equal to the product of the masses (M and m) divided by the square of the distance r between them:
F = GMm/r2
where G is the gravitational constant coupling force to mass and distance.
Newton based his derivation of this law on data collected by generations of astronomers and the laws of motion formulated by Galileo and Kepler. Astronomers long ago established a celestial reference frame in space and time for recording the positions and times of astronomical events. Celestial coordinate system - Wikipedia,
Newton assumed that space and time are independent of one another, so that the same time can prevail at all points in space. He also assumed that the gravitational interactions in the world are instantaneous: gravitational signals travel with infinite velocity.
Einstein and Special Relativity
Einstein developed two theories of relativity. The first, special relativity, was restricted to transformations between bodies in inertial motion. Inertial motion is the unaccelerated motion envisaged in Newton's first law: a body at rest remains at rest and a body in motion continues its motion in a straight line unless acted upon by a force. The second theory, general relativity, deals with all possible transformations between all states of motion, both inertial and accelerated. Inertial frame of reference - Wikipedia
One of the key questions in mathematical physics is the relationship between frames of reference and reality. The modern mathematical view is that motion is relative and it really makes no difference whether we imagine a fixed physical system in a moving reference frame, or vice versa. The essential feature of the motion is the transformation involved. In general a motion has a starting state, a transformation and a finishing state. We may think of the transformation as an algorithm or fixed point.
Einstein realized that the velocity of light is a local phenomenon described by Maxwell's equations, and must be the same for all freely falling observers. From this, with a bit of geometry, one can deduce the Lorentz transformation that carries us from one inertial observer to another. Since it takes signals time to travel a distance, Lorentz transformations affect both distances and times. If I watch you going past me at high velocity, I see your clocks are running slower than mine, your distances foreshortened relative to mine and your masses increased. You see the same changes looking back at me. Both of us see the same properties of standard things things like atoms and eggs in our own locality. Einstein's famous equation E = mc2 is a further consequence of the Lorentz transformation. Maxwell's equations - Wikipedia, Lorentz transformation - Wikipedia, Time dilation - Wikipedia, Length contraction - Wikipedia, Mass in special relativity - Wikipedia
Einstein summed up special relativity in the following words:
Every general law of nature must be so constituted that it is transformed into a law of exactly the same form when, instead of the space-time variables x, y, z, t of the orginal co-ordinate system K, we introduce new space-time variables x', y', z', t' of a co-ordinate system K'. In this connection the relation between the ordinary and accented magnitudes is given by the Lorentz transformation. Or, in brief, general laws of nature are covariant with respect to Lorentz transformations.
This is a definite mathematical condition that the theory of relativity demands of a natural law, and in virtue of this, the theory becomes a valuable heuristic aid in the search for general laws of nature. . . . Einstein: Relativity, page 57
The notion of covariance arises from the belief that coordinate systems are created by physicists and engineers, and are not part of the system observed. Because this is so, we should expect the laws of nature to be indifferent to our choices of coordinate system. This is true in the classical physics of relativity. Quantum mechanics reveals that the reference system used to observe (the 'observable') plays a role in the result.
General relativity
Einstein realized that gravitation and accelerated motion are exceptions to special relativity:
In 1907 when I was working on a review of the consequences of special relativity . . . I realized that all the natural phenomena could be discussed in terms of special relativity except the law of gravitation. I felt a deep desire to understand the reason behind this . . . It was most unsatisfactory to me that although the relation between inertia and energy is so beautifully derived [in special relativity], there is no relation between inertial and weight. I suspected that this relationship was inexplicable by means of special relativity. Pais, page 179
The aim of general relativity is to find all the most general transformations which leave the real space-time distance between events unchanged. By observer we mean any particle capable of receiving and sending information. This led Einstein into complex mathematical issues that were resolved with the help of his friend Marcel Grossman. Grossman provided the crucial ingredient, Riemann's differential geometry, which enabled Einstein to formulate the general theory in mathematical language. Riemannian geometry - Wikipedia
Einstein said that the happiest thought in his life was the realization that a person in free fall would not feel his own weight. In other words it is possible to move inertially in a gravitational field. This path of free fall is called a geodesic. The gravitational field of the Earth, for instance, enables an object like a satellite to circle the Earth in free fall. Albert Einstein, Geodesics in general relativity - Wikipedia
The only way that such freely falling observers can detect the present of gravitation is by their movement relative to one another, a phenomenon called geodesic deviation. Because they are freely falling, they do not 'feel' gravitation. Freely falling observers thus became a reference system which Einstein used to explore the nature of gravitation.
A few years after he began to work on general relativity, Einstein realized that one cannot map space-time in terms of any independent frame of reference. Since we cannot look at the Universe from outside, we must look at it from inside. Also, we are confined to looking at things in our local environment. Our picture of the whole is built from local knowledge.
The solution to this problem was first seen by Gauss, who found a way to describe a surface not by referring it to some frame of reference but by considering the distances between points within the surface itself. This idea was taken up by Riemann who developed the differential geometry which became the mathematical foundation of general relativity. His desire to capture a universal space-time transformation introduced the notion that space-time is not a passive background for universal dynamics, but is part of the dynamics.
It is possible, using Riemann differential geometry, to implement the general principle of relativity: all bodies of reference K, K' etc are equivalent for the description of natural phenomena (formulation of the general laws of nature), whatever may be their state of motion. It required Einstein's insight to see how this could be done. His key was the principle of equivalence. Einstein: Relativity
The relationship between inertial mass and gravitational mass is mediated by the principle of equivalence tells us that no 'blind' observer can distinguish an acceleration from a gravitational field. A person in an enclosed container who feels an attraction to one side of the container cannot tell if this is because the container is being accelerated by an outside force or if it is being held stationary in a gravitational field.
Differential Geometry
Differential geometry describes a differentiable manifold. A differentiable manifold is a manifold in which it is possible to apply calculus. A manifold is a space that is locally flat or Euclidean. Calculus can be applied to spaces which are continuous. A continuous space can be mapped onto the real numbers. Differentiable manifold - Wikipedia, Calculus - Wikipedia
The general idea is that we can create a dynamic (curved) space by assembling infinitesimal portions of flat space in a way that permits differentiable transformations from one to another. We can define a path, called the geodesic, through this curved space, and the relationships between neighbouring geodesics reveals the curvature of space. The accelerated motion between neighbouring geodesics is interpreted as the force of gravity or acceleration, and controls the motions of moving bodies.
As in the Gaussian system, the shape of the space is determined by a metric which measures the distances between events in the space. Any gaussian coordinate system may be used to describe the a space as long as they all yield the same value for the metric.
The only mathematical constraint imposed on the structure of space by general relativity is that transformations be continuous and differentiable. The principal physical constraint is that the general theory predict approximately the same results as Newtonian theory in low energy regions of space-time like our Solar system.
Continuity and information
Continuous mathematics gives us the impression that it represents an infinite density of information. Cantor’s set theory has shown us how to treat continua as transfinite sets of discrete points. This theory is so convincing that we are inclined to treat such points as real symbols in a space of messages.
Quantum theory is worked out in multi-dimensional complex function spaces known as Hilbert spaces. Hilbert spaces are specified by their dimension, which ranges through the integers to the transfinite numbers. Although the coordinate bases of Hilbert spaces may be discrete and orthogonal, vectors in Hilbert space are described by continuous complex parameters. Quantum mechanical operations may be conceived as mathematically perfect parallel analogue computations. This has led the quantum computation community to believe that it may be possible to build quantum computers more powerful that classical turing machines. Quantum computing - Wikipedia
An alternative view of the information capacity of continua is provided by the mathematical theory of communication and algorithmic information theory.
For about 80 years much sweat, maybe some tears (and possibly a little blood) has been spent in the (so far) unsuccessful effort to quantize gravity. Here we interpret this situation as evidence that gravity may not be quantized, that is that it is something inherently continuous and therefore devoid of information.
This feeling arises from the notion that the universe may be modelled as a computer network. An important feature of stable networks is error free communication.
Shannon showed that we can approach error free transmission over a noisy channel by encoding our messages into packets so far apart in message space that the probability of confusion is minimal. We assume that the exchange of particles in the physical universe corresponds to the exchange of messages in the network model. Claude E Shannon
This correspondence enables us to interpret quantization as a consequence of the error free communication which (we assume) underlies the stability of universal structure. Conversely, we should not expect to find quantization where error is impossible, that is in a regime where every possible message is a valid message. Since gravitation couples universally to energy alone, and is blind to the particular nature of the particles or fields associated with energy, we can imagine that gravitation involves unconstrained and therefore intrinsically error free and non-quantized interaction.
Algorithmic information theory points in a similar direction. Working on the basis of Gödel's incompleteness result, Gregory Chaitin suggests that there can be no more information in a theory derived logically from a set of axioms than there is in the axioms themselves. An algorithm such as F = ma, therefore, even though the variables may be continuous quantities, contains no more information that that represented by the symbolic expression F = ma. Algorithmic information theory - Wikipedia, Chaitin: Information, Randomness & Incompleteness
From this point of view, Einstein’s principle of general covariance, that any gaussian coordinate system will do to describe a physical situation provided that any two coordinate representations same observable event can be joined by a continuous transformation also suggests that there is no information in a continuum. All gaussian representations express the same information in a different coordinate frame (or language), and the continuous transformation between them neither adds nor subtracts any information. General covariance - Wikipedia
This suggests that we can identify logical and geometric continuity. A logical continuum is equivalent to the deterministic argument (that is the computation) that binds the hypothesis of a theorem to its conclusion: if we accept Euclidian geometry, the interior angles of a triangle total 180 degrees. A logical continuum is a computable algorithm (turing machine) that, like a geometric continuum, transmits or transforms information without error from one representation to another. In this sense it is equivalent to a lossless codec. Codec - Wikipedia
Universality and the physical layer of the universal network
The general theory predicts that a geometrically consistent Universe must be either expanding or contracting. Current observations tell us that our Universe is expanding. Since the finite velocity of light enables us to look back in time, we can see the history of the Universe back to when it was a few hundred thousand years old and the photons we see as cosmic background radiation were emitted. Cosmic microwave background radiation - Wikipedia
As for as we know, gravitation is universal. Every form of energy in the Universe is believed to be coupled to gravitation so that every process can communicate with every other via the gravitational channel.
A corollary of the universality of gravitation is its antiquity. In the layered network model gravitation is the ultimate physical layer. We must assume that it is a property of the initial singularity since this is the origin of process of gravitational expansion and complexification that has led to the Universe we now observe. We assume here that energy, time, momentum and space are all early emergent properties of the Universe. This hypothesis couples gravitation to action, which we take to be the primordial property of the universe.
Our hypothesis is that gravitation existed before space and time emerged, and its sole reality is Einstein's field equation when the tensors are reduced to scalars. Einstein field equations - Wikipedia
Hawking and Ellis studied Einsteins theory and concluded that it predicted the existence of boundaries to space time which we call singularities. The formation of black holes is a time reversed microcosm of the big bang. We take the view that if there is a path from four dimensional space-time to a singularity there is formally a path back from a singuarity to four dimensional spacetime, as demonstrated by the expansion of the universe both in size and complexity. Hawking & Ellis: The Large Scale Structure of Space-TimeWe are guessing here that gravitation is the root state of the Universe, the first fixed point to appear in the divine dynamics and, from a formal point of view, the root of all the states built from it. The gravitational state is one, and defines the whole structure of the Universe. From a network point of view, we may see gravitation as an unmodulated carrier, transmitting energy but no data.
Action
Gravitation sees only energy, that is the time rate of action. To apply the network model to physics we establish a correspondence between a quantum of action and the execution of Turing machine, ie a halting computation. Energy is then equivalent to the rate of completed computations, that is the frequency of network communication, and momentum to the spatial resolution of the message being transmitted. From a network point of view, this is equivalent to measuring traffic or bandwidth in symbols per second.
From physics to metaphysics
Aristotle's theory of potency and act served to build a bridge between the physics and metaphysics. In a more recent work, Bernard Lonergan developed this idea by interpreting potency and act as psychological terms. Potency is our desire to know; actuality is actual knowledge. The transformation between potency and act is the act of insight. Lonergan: Inaight
Insight defines as metaphysics as the integral heuristic structure of proportionate being. Here we wish to discard a presumption contained in this definition. Proportionate being is being which humans can understand. The definition implies a limit on human understanding, which Lonergan introduces to honour the Catholic dogma that God is an invisible mystery beyond human understanding. Here we consider restriction on human knowledge is unnecessary, given our assumption that the universe is divine and God is visible. Although we can understand our divine milieu, its complexity means that this task will never be complete.
A heuristic structure is in effect a map of the unknown used to guide the search for knowledge. The layering of the network model provides a natural heuristic structure, since we see that more complex processes are built from simpler ones. The simpler processes provide an heuristic guide to understanding the the more complex processes buit from them. From this point of view, metaphysics is the foundation of physics.
Gravitation and the Trinity
From a formal point of view there is nothing to distinguish the structureless initial singularity predicted by the general theory and the completely simple divinity proposed by medieval theologians. As mystics have long known, there is nothing to be said about this God. Nevertheless, we wish to argue that the enormously complex universe of our experience is this same God. The source of the complexity is the fixed points in the divine dynamics. These points are not outside the divinity, but part of it, fixed points in the dynamics.
Science begins when when the initial singularity splits into two, formally p and not-p. This step was taken long ago and is explicitly invoked in the opening words of John's Gospel: In the beginning was the Word. John's statement is a reflection of the ancient view that the intellectual word is a representation within us of what we know. This psychological idea, extended to the divinity, interprets God's understanding of itself as the Word of God, which is understood to be the second person of the Trinity. John: Gospel
This approach to understanding the Trinity was developed by Augustine and was further developed by Aquinas. More recently, Lonergan has developed the idea in books on the Word and the Trinity. Augustine: The Trinity, Aquinas 103402: Summa Theologiae I, 34, 2, Lonergan: Verbum, Lonergan: The Triune God
Self reference, gravitation and evolution
In 1912 Einstein realized that the gravitational field was non-linear because it acts upon itself. Gravitation sees only energy and gravity is a form of energy. Energy is the rate of action. Gravitation is action, and feeds back onto itself. Such self reference is the foundation for evolution and control.
From the network, point of view, gravitation is the protocol for sending messages. It does not look inside the messages, merely transmits them. From this point of view, it is isomorphic to a power transmission network which simply moves quanta of action with no reference to their meaning. It also applies to meaningful sets of action, like myself. I feel gravity in proportion to my energy and no other parameter.
The self reference of such a network lays the foundation for the evolution of messages with more complex structures and smaller constituencies. From our physical point of view, these messages correspond to the other three fundamental forces, the strong force, the weak force and electromagnetism. The rest of this chapter deals with the network origin of these fundamental universal symmetries.
We see the emergence of the complex world from the initial singularity as analogous to procession of the Word of God from the Father alluded to in John's Gospel. Gravitation is the first word of God, the first fixed point in the divine dynamics, upon which all else is built.
(revised 18 May 2016)