... to restore theology to the mainstream of science
Table of contents
Introduction
<!-- Unlinked
titles are merely a speculative guide to future work.-->
Page 1: What are the limits to
language? [lang01WhatLimits]
Mystical language
stresses experiences so sublime that they cannot be put into words.
This implies a boundary to language. Goedel was able to place some
broad boundaries on language, and these serve as a guide to our
general understanding of language.
Page 2: The symmetry of affirmation
and denial [lang02Symmetry]
Aquinas, following
ancient tradition, conceded that God was so large that we could not
say anything positive about it, but say only what it is not? But are
these two bodies different, or is an affirmation as good as a denial
for conveying information about an entity?
Page 3: Language and error [lang03Error]
It would be nice to
have a completely error free language which could convey perfectly
human thought from one person to another. There are two sources of
error: errors in the recognition of symbols, and errors in
recognition of the meaning of symbols.
Page 4: Language and error [lang04Error]
It would be nice to
have a completely error free language which could convey perfectly
human thought from one person to another. There are two sources of
error: errors in the recognition of symbols, and errors in
recognition of the meaning of symbols.
Page 5: Language and control [lang05Control]
Too much error, and
language would fail. The space of error is from one point of view
larger than the space of truth. From this point of view it is easier
to fall into error than to stick to the truth. Control processes
detect error and correct it. From the point of view of control, the
space of truth is larger than the error, and so acts as a potential
opposing the potential for error.
Page 6: The evolution of language
[lang06Evolution]
The balance between
error and control means that a small level of error persists. This
error explores the space around the truth, sometimes finding new
truths which may, in the long run, displace the old. The result is
the slow evolution of species, and the much faster evolution of
language. The distance between languages, as between species, can be
used as a measure of the time since they parted from their common
root.
Page 7: Language in the transfinite
network [lang07Net]
A quick fit of the
previous observations about language to the transfinite network, the
model that describes the formal backbone of this site. The network
allows us to understand the interaction between the competing powers
of order and chaos in a complex system. These powers contribute to
both the unification and differentiation of languages.
|