Notes
[Sunday 4 December 2011 - Saturday 10 December 2011]
[Notebook: DB 71 Israel]
[page 91]
Sunday 4 December 2011
Travelling = accessing memory
Monday 5 December 2011
Continuing with the Synopsis trying to tweak it closer to my current view of reality.
Everything we do is gardening and our whole technology consists in establishing juxtapositions (and disestablishing them). So we may say that space-time is the dynamic screen (interface) between us
[page 92]
The world runs on confidence, that is trust that the correspondent will respond appropriately, like paying a debt, delivering the goods, keep their promises etc. Trust is required when an event is not deterministic (fully controlled [variety reduced to zero]).
. . .
The question always arises: Is all this work worth it? Am I compromising the survival of myself and my descendants by giving so much time to a project that may ultimately prove unproductive, a business doomed to fail? Turing says some calculations do not terminate, but there is no way to tell in advance which ones.
Tuesday 6 December 2011
Wednesday 7 December 2011
Empirical residue = symmetry
At this moment, in my mind, the key connection is between the eigenfunctions of a quantum operator and computable functions.
Those who would pry into other people's affairs can to some extent constrain the software that is running in a computer by sampling the spectrum of the electromagnetic radiation that it emits and perhaps compare it to the spectra of software packages known to them.
[page 93]
ELEMENT = PACKAGE = POINT = VECTOR . . .
Hiassen: Amusing catalogues of Florida's vices, ie errors threatening its stability seen through the eyes of a long time working journalist. Hiaasen
Orgasm = insight, the state of creative bliss resulting from bringing something into being, occurs at all scales. With the creation we invariably expect some annihilation, so we can prevent creation by preventing annihilation, ie make things deterministic by avoiding all errors.
You grip my heart (or maybe me) with your tales of woe as well as the attraction you radiate. The coupling is based on the shared code of love. Love, like God, has a large number of stationary points which are gradually introduced to the measurement basis in the process of 'getting to know you'.
Quantum mechanics has no memory and therefore no concept of order, a fact reflected in the symmetry between basis states in a Hilbert space. At the quantum mechanical level all states are equiprobable. The symmetry is broken when space, memory and ordering appear.
Gödel numbers encode an ordered set into a cardinal number one transfinite (ie exponential) step beyond the cardinal of the relevant ordered set.
So quantum mechanics is a cardinal rather than an ordinal theory and the sheep we are counting are quanta of action, pure and simple, like sheep, quanta are conserved and their
[page 94]
cardinal in general is (< ?) ℵ0. We may assign any natural number to the set of acts, and reorganize them as units with no form so that they are identical = symmetrical, a bit like prime matter, but also a bit like pure act. The set whose cardinal is 0 does not exist by definition. No action, no existence. Quantum mechanics deals with sets of cardinal 1, 2, 3, . . . < ℵ0 Because these states have no personality, only existence, they are symmetrical (or effectively continuous) -- is this how we move the continuous symmetry theorems into the quantum (= digital) space? So all quantum interactions at this scale conform to simple arithmetic E1 + E2 = h(f1 + f2), perfectly linear as we expect the work of accountants to be when they deal in a unit called $ rather than h.
Can we boil Gödel down to the proposition that a small Gödel number cannot control a large Gödel number just as two acts cannot control three acts. The two acts may neutralize any two of the acts, but the third is still free.
Arithmetic is symmetrical with respect to the size of the number it deals with. Accounting is the same for both paupers and billionaires, although in real life there are nonlinearities (creative, annihilative) at both levels (all levels, strict arithmetic is waived by higher forces).
So arithmetic has the symmetry of a boson. It is indifferent to the energy (actions per second) in a state.
The vocabulary of mathematics begins with the natural numbers. These numbers are infinite because we can always
[page 95]
add the next one, but they are the lowest degree of infinity called countable. The numbers are symmetrical which is why inductive proof (and process) works.
At every point the world is completely intelligible, but that does not constrain the symmetry inherent in the point, its creative edge, the space into which it can evolve.
Fixed point a firm personality. Communist Party of China is not a fixed point, it has no corporate face or identity, it can do what it likes. McGregor
. . .
If it seems too good to be true it probably is. To the contrary is the long period of development that goes before each leap forward as many ideas are juggled until one comes to the top. This may be a sign of continuous real progress or ever better developed delusion, the judgement can only come when the creative dynamic is fossilized into a publication (message, stationary point). So over about the last 25 years these notes reflect my slow stagger toward the current position. On the road every little step counts, and small steps coalesce into big ones with connection and pruning, ie variation and selection.
A big thing now is to make certain that all this work has not been in vain by publishing and evangelizing.
The mathematical literature (written and oral) is the set of fixed points of the mathematical community.
The principal concern of a ruling power is to
[page 96]
control the external forum, the messages that people transmit to one another, so no killing, no bodily harm and so on. This control may be exercised either by policing the external forum of educating (propagandizing) the internal forum.
Mungello Leibniz and Confucianism: How should Christians approach China? To learn or to convert? Mungello
Thursday 8 December 2011
Kahneman page 11: Herbert Simon on expert intuition: 'The situation has provided a cue; this cue has given the expert access to the information stored in memory, and the information provides the answer. Intuition is nothing more and nothing less than recognition.' Kahneman
Arithmetic can all be built from addition and subtraction, the fusion and dissection of sets of units, ie the addition and subtraction of cardinal numbers. Arithmetic, like gravitation, is completely blind to the nature of the units to which it is applied, be they atoms or galaxies. All these things instantiate the formal expression 1 + 1 = 2.
Mungello page 36: 'In spite of Leibniz' disagreement on the origin of the Tartars, he was later to be generally sympathetic to the view, held by so many Jesuits, that ancient China did possess the True law, and that this was the basis on which the cultural accord between China and the West could best be
[page 97]
established.'
Not Christianity, humanity, much broader.
Friday 9 December 2011
Do I trust what I am saying? Yes. I have been skittering over the top of things for a long time, looking for breadth of vision rather than detail. But the devil is in the details and I am coming to them now, fitting the dream into the reality which means mapping the transfinite network to quantum field theory.
I believe in it because I believe there is salvation in bandwidth. The more clearly we see things the more sensibly we will act. Many people (the right, authoritarian wing) want to blur our vision, hide in secrecy.
There is no justification for secrecy. A higher layer, using a lower layer, must respect all the protocols of the lower layer if it wants maximum entropy. One maximises entropy by maximizing the entropy per symbol emitted, ie by making them equiprobable.