Notes DB 90: Psychogenesis_2024
Sunday 7 April 2024 - Saturday 13 April 2024
[page 284]
Sunday 7 April 2024
Trying to find the book. My biggest insight in cognitive cosmology is the divinity of gravitation, but how do I package this to make it credible. Thinking I will begin with Trinity instead of actus purus, but I think gravitation is a better fit. So chapter 1: Gravity is Divine? Divine is pure action. Pure action has no form [potential] or content. The impossible god tries to unite omniscience with simplicity, so gravity is the Impossible God.
Cognitive cosmology seems to me to be a technical victory whose principal feature is the decision to make Hilbert space and quantum mechanics the mind of the
[page 285]
Universe. Hence the term cognitive. How do we turn this into theology? The course of events is naked gravitation (Xian god), Hilbert space, quantum mechanics, second generation of fixed points, particles, spacetime. This is basically a biography of god: naked gravitation ≡ actus purus the making of a graphic novel beginning with a cloud of unknowing = ignorance which is nevertheless impotent. Why doesn't this excite me? Because I am a greedy two-year-old and want more. Also I am tired [but I must face the fact that this fits together beautifully with the traditional story].
Monday 8 April 2024
Like everybody working for the Catholic Church, Aquinas had to toe the line to keep his job [and it was probably too much fun to give up].
CC chapter 2: God is a literary creation, a character in a book, a character in a philosophical treatise, a character in scientific papers. God, like all gods is a literary creation [because none of these are real, although in their day they are modelled on well known warlords] and I am adding a few addled thoughts [to the literature, but my God is real and I am sitting on them and feeling them holding me down].
Tuesday 9 April 2024
Becoming involved in the book now, and realize I should continue the biographical journey by recounting in Chapter 2 my encounter with Lonergan and the birth of my cosmic god [and, in consequence, my becoming a heretic].
[page 286]
Lonergan's new picture of god. Chapter 2
2.1: God a literary personality or actus purus In my third year as a Dominican the move to Wahroonga after my engagement with music and my organ teacher. Sink or swim on the Gregorian chant.
New start, a bit of rearrangement putting the Trinity ahead of Lonergan since his work on Aquinas began with the Verbum essays in Theological Studies and led to the two volumes on Trinity, doctrines and systematics. Bernard Lonergan (1997): Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas, Lonergan (2009): The Triune God: Doctrines , Lonergan (2007): The Triune God: Systematics
Wednesday 10 April 2024
A morning of doubt. What is my position on the Higgs particle? Basically I do not know how it is meant to work to give a photon the mass of the electroweak particles W and Z. Read read. As I write the book I will check cognitive cosmology again and edit as necessary. So far the book goes happily, today Chapter 3 Lonergan, how a Jesuit turned a baby Dominican into a heretic. I owe him a big thankyou for getting me out of the clutches of the Dominican Order, motto "Veritas" reality Catholic (but not Christian) lies. The "fathers" of the Council of Nicea completely missed the point of Christianity as seen by Jesus, who conducted a campaign against the "Jewish" bureaucracy that eventually took after the Church.
[page 287]
The book Chapter 4 Evolution within the initial singularity, ∅. Here we apply fixed point theory to establish a Hilbert space, the vectors of which are in effect normalized radii rotating on the complex plane. Invoking the notion of symmetry with respect to complexity I can imagine myself as such a vector dealing in a mental (kinematic) way with all the other basis vectors, driven by the divine unmoved mover, naked gravitation, ignorant but omnipotent. This dynamic space, like so many notes of an orchestra creates stationary points by superposition which are kinematic, while stationary but endowed with dynamism by the bifurcation of naked gravitation into potential and kinetic energy. This is the story of the creation of the particles that represent the form of the world in Minkowski space. The particles, fermions and bosons, create the space, the massless bosons moving on null geodesics as if their birth and death remain the same point, travelling across the Universe perhaps, in an interval of zero. And the fermions, only capable of existing spatially separated, annihilating into photons if they meet. Then we have to deal with massive bosons, the elimination of antiparticles and the creation of eternal photons, all requiring roles in the story with mathematical justifications which nevertheless fit into a logically coherent story.
[page 288]
Then Chapter 5 spacetime: Hilbert mind and Minkowski body. The trick is to make this whole story consistent with modern physics, both quantum and classical at all scales, a miracle of exposition which I sincerely hope is forming in my mind, a large self-adjoint operator producing all the real events in my life from a superposition of a countable infinity of musical notes represented by the basis states of a Hilbert space. Now for an evening walk.
Back to Chapter 4. I am feeling delighted by the trip from special relativity via general relativity to the gravitational initial singularity to gaining a Hilbert space within it as the first step toward becoming, via quantum mechanics, the father of a son. Perhaps I am fey but happy, which is probably all I want although I have begin to feel a bit daring as I close on the idea that naked gravitation is omnipotent, absolutely ignorant, divine, eternal and the source of the world. I just have to steer close to the straight and narrow now to keep the dream flowing, the third age of scientific theology.
Thursday 11 April 2024
Friday 12 April 2024
Chapter 4 establishes the initial singularity as a
[page 289]
dynamic entity. We now need (?) to introduce the distinction between dynamic and kinematic, which is a bit like mind and body, but we need a) to find a meaningful terms for the non-scientific reader and b) introduce the mechanism of zero sum bifurcation connected with the idea of non-causal (probabilistic, kinematic) and causal (deterministic, dynamic) as a foundation both for bootstrapping the Universe (chance, variation) and fixing it (deterministic, selection) and hook this all to the P vs NP problem. A very full meal to eat at one sitting, to be chapter 5_chance vs cause? kinematic vs dynamic? Hilbert vs Minkowski? random vs causal? variation vs selection. As the key to all this is memory vs no memory, eternity vs change [Parmenides vs Heraclitus]. So perhaps this chapter is about the emergence of time from eternity, the first step toward time-space, the proper order of the words, complex time exists in Hilbert space, the space of music. so we have cut a few first pieces of the jigsaw and join them together.
So let it be: Chapter 5_eternity = eternity and time:
Throughout my monastic career I remained strictly private as to my personal life and feeling while revelling in my attempts to lead my brothers into the mysteries which science has revealed since Aristotle died.
[page 290]
I revealed nothing about my affection for my brothers, although I am sure some of the management noticed it and in later days it involved creeping around the corridors at night. The end of romance was the worst feature of my dismissal and I studiously avoided further contact although others also left the Order. I never had the slightest qualms about my scientific ideas and have been excited by them ever since. I occurred to me in the last six months that gravity is the [first] reality of divinity and it is slowly working its way into the heart of the book. Newton and Einstein saw God. Newton in the vision recoded in his general Scholium. Einstein in his struggle with [general] relativity. Now I have gone behind Minkowski space into the heart of naked gravitation and identified it as the clitoris of the Universe, the unbounded power and pleasure that lies at the heart of the absolutely simple totally ignorant initial singularity in which the Universe has emerged by a process something like that described in cognitive cosmology [cosmogenesis, and will be recounted in the book]. The book is not yet science but science fiction, the [artistic] beginning of science, awaiting development and testing to become mythologically identical to the world it describes. My story begins with the music in Hilbert space, and the superposition of tones as de Broglie saw to construct the fixed points which are the living divine mind of God, of which we and our planet are but a tiny dynamic representation.
Saturday 13 April 2024
Dreaming in the morning about the physics of force vs the physics of knowledge. Is the big bang really a big bang or is it just physics as usual on a high energy scale? Theology the same. Is murder simply theology on a high energy scale, as practised by warlords like Yahweh. What about contact sports? Is the aim to overcome the opponent by disabling them or subjecting them to helpless pleasure? The first approach is widely approved, the second, practised widely in the pornography industry, is considered evil, antisocial and to be disparaged. Newton produced the physics of forces; Einstein the physics of inertial motion.
Sites 3000 k
Jammer Force [age 261:No force in gravitation, just mathematical logic. Max Jammer (1957, 1999); Concepts of Force: A Study in the Foundations of Dynamics
|
Copyright:
You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.
Further readingBooks
Jammer (1957, 1999), Max, Concepts of Force: A Study in the Foundations of Dynamics, Dover 2011 'Both historical treatment and critical analysis, this work by a noted physicist takes a fascinating look at a fundamental of physics, tracing its development from ancient to modern times. Kepler's initiation of scientific conceptualization, Newton's definition, post-Newtonian reinterpretation — contrasting concepts of Leibniz, Boscovich, Kant with those of Mach, Kirchhoff, Hertz. In-depth analysis of contemporary trend toward eliminating force from conceptual scheme of physics. "An excellent presentation." — Science. 1962 edition.'
Amazon
back |
Lonergan (1997), Bernard J F, and Robert M. Doran, Frederick E. Crowe (eds), Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas (Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan volume 2), University of Toronto Press 1997 Jacket: 'Verbum is a product of Lonergan's eleven years of study of the thought of Thomas Aquinas. The work is considered by many to be a breakthrough in the history of Lonergan's theology . . .. Here he interprets aspects in the writing of Aquinas relevant to trinitarian theory and, as in most of Lonergan's work, one of the principal aims is to assist the reader in the search to understand the workings of the human mind.'
Amazon
back |
Lonergan (2007), Bernard J F, and Michael G Shields (translator), Robert M Doran & H Daniel Monsour (editors), The Triune God: Systematics (Collected Works, volume 12), University of Toronto press 2007 De Deo trino, or The Triune God, is the third great instalment on one particular strand in trinitarian theology, namely, the tradition that appeals to a psychological analogy for understanding trinitarian processions and relations.
The analogy dates back to St Augustine but was significantly developed by St Thomas Aquinas. Lonergan advances it to a new level of sophistication by rooting it in his own highly nuanced cognitional theory and in his early position on decision and love. . . . This is truly one of the great masterpieces in the history of systematic theology, perhaps even the greatest of all time.'
Amazon
back |
Lonergan (2009), Bernard J F, and Robert M Doran and H Daniel Monsour (eds), The Triune God: Doctrines (Volume 11 of Collected Works), University of Toronto Press 2009 Bernard Lonergan (1904-1984), a professor of theology, taught at Regis College, Harvard University, and Boston College. An established author known for his Insight and Method in Theology, Lonergan received numerous honorary doctorates, was a Companion of the Order of Canada in 1971 and was named as an original members of the International Theological Commission by Pope Paul VI.
Amazon
back |
Links
Angela Giuffrida, Vatican calls gender fluidity and surrogacy threats to human dignity, ' Vatican calls gender fluidity and surrogacy threats to human dignity
Infinite Dignity declaration reaffirms church’s position on gender reassignment, abortion and euthanasia
Angela Giuffrida in Rome
' The Vatican has described the belief in gender fluidity as “a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God”, as it released an updated declaration of what the Catholic church regards as threats to human dignity.
The new Dignitas infinita (Infinite Dignity) declaration released by the Vatican’s doctrinal office on Monday after five years in the making reiterates Pope Francis’s previous criticism of what he has called an “ugly ideology of our time”.
“Desiring a personal self-determination, as gender theory prescribes, apart from this fundamental truth that human life is a gift, amounts to a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God, entering into competition with the true God of love revealed to us in the gospel,” the 20-page document says.' back |
Harald Fox (2024), Peter Higgs was one of the greats of particle physics. He transformed what we know about the building blocks of the universe
, 'Peter Higgs, who gave his name to the subatomic particle known as the Higgs boson, has died aged 94. He was always a modest man, especially when considering that he was one of the greats of particle physics – the area of science concerned with the building blocks of matter.
In 1964, a few years after arriving from London to take up a position at the University of Edinburgh, Higgs read a paper by the American theoretical physicist Philip Anderson. At the time, physicists did not have a theory for how subatomic particles got their mass. (Mass can be described as the total amount of matter in an object, while weight is the force of gravity acting on an object.)
Anderson’s paper showed that particles can have mass. When a system in physics – such as two different subatomic particles – becomes changed, physicists sometimes describe it as having “broken symmetry”. This can lead to the emergence of new properties.
During a walk in the Scottish Highlands, Higgs had the idea of a lifetime. He figured out exactly how to apply the symmetry breaking he had read about in Anderson’s paper to an important group of particles called gauge bosons. It would lead to an explanation for how the building blocks of matter acquire their mass.' back |
Javaid Rehman (Centre for Crime and Justice Studies), Freedom of expression, apostasy, and blasphemy within Islam: Sharia, criminal justice systems, and modern Islamic state practices, ' The dictatorial regime of General Zia (1977–1988) introduced draconian and arbitrary anti-blasphemy legislation in Pakistan. While ostensibly aimed at the Islamisation of Pakistan, the primary purpose of these laws was to strength Zia’s theocratic and religiously fundamentalist regime. Chapter XV of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) 1860 (as amended) lists in Section 295–297 a series of offences ‘relating to Religion’. The most controversial, however, has been the interpretation and application of Section 295–C of the PPC, which has made it an offence (subsequently held to be punishable by death) to make derogatory remarks about the Holy Prophet. The interpretation and application of the so-called anti-blasphemy laws, in particular Section 295–C, has been extremely unfortunate. Muslims as well as non-Muslims have been charged with the offence of blasphemy, with spurious charges such as support for Rushdie, or for the Ahmaddiyas displaying the Kalma Tayyaba in their shops or for offering Azan (Islamic call for prayers) (Rehman, 2001). It must be emphasised that the overall impact of these laws has been regrettable; not only have they produced a culture of religious intolerance, bigotry, and fanaticism but they also deter any form of rational and tolerant expression on matters pertaining to religion. This has created an environment which inculcates a sense of fear; religious extremists consider any criticism of existing political and socioeconomic evils within the ‘Islamic State’ to contravene the blasphemy laws. Cases have been registered against non-Muslim minorities and Muslims alike, under the blasphemy laws. The situation is such that even a recommendation to reconsider the existence of these laws potentially evokes serious recriminations and, therefore, any official proposal of repeal appears unlikely.' back |
Julienne van Loon (2024), Bruce Pascoe’s Black Duck is a ‘healing and necessary’ account of a year on his farm, following a difficult decade after Dark Emu, ' Bruce Pascoe is best known for his natural history, Dark Emu, which argues that systems of pre-colonial food production and land management in Australia have been dramatically understated. At last count, the book had sold at least 360,000 copies of the original edition – and many more in the form of adaptations, translations, children’s and overseas editions.
Since the publication of Dark Emu in 2014, Pascoe has had to endure extraordinary public scrutiny, as well as vehement attacks on his personal and professional reputation.
Those who envy Pascoe’s runaway sales figures would surely not covet the scale of the personal attacks launched against him, primarily (but not wholly) led by right-wing critics who read the arguments laid out in Dark Emu as an opportunity to reignite Australia’s History Wars. . . .
The work has echoes of Tove Jansson’s beautiful masterwork, The Summer Book, for its foregrounding of the land and its seasons, and for the emphasis on care and responsibility towards the natural environment. Pascoe’s skill with the poetics of nature writing, imbued with Indigenous knowledge, does much to create the book’s gentle pattern and its purpose.
It is a quiet, funny, warm and insistent call to return to and care for Country. In this way, Black Duck: A Year at Yumburra makes a welcome contribution to Australian nonfiction.' back |
Micaela Sahhar & Stephen Pascoe, The politics of recognition: Australia and the question of Palestinian statehood, ' Zionist claims to self-determination were endorsed by the British government’s Balfour Declaration of 1917. But under the terms of the mandate of Palestine administered by Britain under the new League of Nations charter, indigenous Palestinian Arabs were catalogued among the “peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world”.
Two decades later, Australia played a key role in the recognition of Israeli statehood at the United Nations. It is now well known that Australian Herbert Vere “Doc” Evatt, who presided over the UN Special Committee on Palestine, was instrumental in garnering international support for the proposed partition of Palestine. Australia was one of the first countries to recognise Israel in 1948.
Herbert Vere Evatt
In contrast, Britain initially maintained a policy of non-recognition of Israel, a position still held by some 30 countries.
The creation of Israel was also inextricably linked to the Palestinian Nakba, when an estimated 750,000 people were expelled during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. As former Knesset member Haneen Zoabi has observed, the Nakba is therefore indivisibly a part of the Jewish history of the land, as much as it is Palestinian history. . . ..
It is important to recall that UN Resolution 194, recognising Israeli statehood, did so on the condition that Palestinians ethnically cleansed from their ancestral lands would be given the right of return, or be appropriately compensated. This resolution has been reaffirmed annually since 1949 and is fundamental to the question of a just peace.' back |
Paula Gerber (2024), Tickle vs Giggle: in a world where transgender people are under attack, this is a test case for Australia, ' Around the world, the human rights of transgender people are under attack. Media reports of trans women being vilified, excluded and discriminated against are frequent, and the consequences of this rise in hatred towards trans people can be deadly.
In the United States, animosity towards trans people is reaching fever pitch with 42 of the 50 states introducing laws that seek to limit trans people’s access to healthcare, participation in sport, use of bathrooms and serving in the military, as well as censoring education about gender identity.
There is increasing concern that a US-style anti-trans campaign is underway in Australia. This week, a spotlight was shone on these issues in the Federal Court, where a trans woman, Roxanne Tickle, has taken a women-only social media platform to court for discrimination.
This case is providing the court with a rare opportunity to determine the extent to which the Sex Discrimination Act protects a trans woman from discrimination on the basis of their gender identity. Although the act was amended more than a decade ago to prohibit discrimination on such a basis, this is the first time these laws are being tested in court. . . .
Although some people don’t agree, a person’s sex is not fixed and can be changed, as reflected in the language of section 32I of the NSW Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act. It states:
a person the record of whose sex is altered under this Part is, for the purposes of, but subject to, any law of New South Wales, a person of the sex as so altered.'
' back |
|