Notes DB 91: Divine_Gravitation_2024
Sunday 30 June 2024 - Saturday 6 July 2024
Sunday 30 June 2024
[page 17]
Monday 1 July 2024
What next? Article defending / explaining my key point, ie placing Hilbert space at the foundation of the Universe, built on / in gravitation [initial singularity]. Data from Nielsen and Chuang. Nielsen & Chuang (2016): Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
[page 18]
How do we do this? Assume initial singularity then entropy argument from heuristic of simplicity then go to symmetry with respect to complexity all conducted in Hilbert space beginning with qubit - this to become backbone to letter to Cambridge UP explaining Cognitive Cosmogenesis.
I have written a beautiful book and now I have to sell it. The problem: find a path from the initial singularity.
The Thomistic answer fails because absolute simplicity and [omniscience] are incompatible because information is physical.
The big bang fails because it is just a 'Hail Mary' imagining an impossible explosion from the initial singularity from which the Universe condenses out. The evidence is high energy accelerator experiments but there is no explanation.
So my story . . . Another morning I go from despair to excitement. It is so regular I can bank on it. Check the Adelaide house sitter jobs.
Tuesday 2 July 2024
Catholic doctrine is a debunked hypothesis because
[page 19]
its fundamental assumption is impossible, that the initial singularity is omniscient. Should I drop the personal back-story. No simply phrase is as in Einstein's 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' and go on to show that the truth is stranger than fiction.
We treat the Nicene Creed as an hypothesis. This creed makes no mention of the central core of Christianity as stated by its eponymous founder, love god, love your neighbour, but it does represent an hypothesis about the structure of reality [the fictitious cosmology prevailing among the bishops of Nicea].
[Housing connect 132 299, Housing Advice Appointment Croydon Park Tuesday 23, 9.30 am, 340 Torrens Road.]
[Web stats]
Truth may be stranger than fiction and it is infinitely powerful. The fictional superpersons can all fly unaided but this does not reflect reality and flying requires specially designed and constructed machinery [as discovered by dinosaurs, birds and Wright brothers].
[page 20
[Cognitive cosmogenesis] Chapter 5: Eternity, time, Hilbert space — time, complex numbers, fixed points Hilbert space but Turing and Gödel tell us that this fixation and determinism does not really constrain the Universe. A lot of what I have written in the book has meaning that I did not understand while I waa recording it. Rewriting the annotated table of contents for Manchester University is a bit of an eye opener in that direction. I wanted to do it in a day (as usual impatient) but now I will back off and schedule the Manchester submission to be complete by the end of the weekend. Tomorrow taken up with Auntie, shopping for flower seeds and Midnight Oil movie. Glad to find an excuse to take myself off the hook.
Wednesday 3 July 2024
Thursday 4 July 2024
Another idea: An article for Theological Studies summarizing book. This and Manxhester U over the weekend, article to be a conflation of the Manchester U annotated table of contents.
Friday 5 July 2024
Working on the Manchester submission. +$1476 on the market. Going back over 2017 submission to Theological Studies to see how far I have come in the last 7 years. Began writing 2o17_02_26: Title Scientific Theology.
[page 21]
Submitted to TS 1 June 2017 via ScholarOne / rejected [as expected].
Saturday 6 July 2024
A idea: to become a best seller in theological conspiracy like Deighton, Greene and LeCarre, ie recognizing that fiction based on a tissue of fact is the way to go. Meanwhile stick to the facts in a quest for scientific theology. Check what happened to my 2017 submission in the year after mum died 2016_05_24. Grandchild Sina Claude Jeffrey George Fofana born 29/5/2015
Reading old stuff and getting the feeling that I knew it all along, ie an interpretation of the standard model pternip / print /books / interpret_s_model. This covers the backbone of cognitive cosmogenesis 17 years ago aged 62. The improvements have been incremental but I am close to the end - just have to make the connection between quantum mechanics and transfinite numbers again which has been holding me up for most of this year. If I get a bite for the book I have to rewrite it to include P vs NP and transfinite numbers. First complete the submission to Manchester and then
[page 22]
the paper for Theological Studies which will be a precis of the book. Breakfast time. Although I am nearly as old as Biden I am hoping to make an impression in the theological world before I die (in 2045?). P versus NP problem - Wikipedia
Minkowski velocity of light cognitive cosmogenesis 24.6:
Thus the essence of this postulate may be clothed mathematically in a very pregnant manner in the mystic formula 3 × 105 kilometres = i (√ –1) secondsAlbert Einstein (1923): The Principle of Relativity - A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of Relativity. With notes by A. Sommerfeld. Translated by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery
We might say that the whole of nineteenth century mathematics was directed to understanding calculus and continuity. Toward the beginning of the twentieth century, the emphasis changed to proof and logic because attempts to make sense of continuity had led to paradox. This history is being repeated in physics, where attempts to study the universe as though it is continuous have led to endless problems that have had to be dealt with with dodgy ideas like renormalization. The Nyquist-Shannon digitization theorem cuts all this away, digitizing everything in the interests of error free communication. Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem - Wikipedia
