Notes DB 91: Divine_Gravitation_2024
Sunday 8 September 2024 - Saturday 14 September 2024
Sunday 8 September 2024
[page 128]
Every morning I need a reality check to protect myself against the dreams of doom that sometimes infest my nights. This is implicit in the evolutionary process, possibilities meeting realities. At present I am in an ancient dilemma, facing the prospect of homelessness because the security of my home is threatened. This underlines the realty of evolution, hunting for the necessities of life in a somewhat alien environment which the Church takes advantage of by teaching us (falsely) that the world is not our home, an imaginary heaven is our home and giving us a motivation for martyrdom and suicide to speed up our transition to eternal rest and perfect serenity in the arms of God. Resist temptation and stick to the scientific tracking of reality. cc19_network is coming
[page 129]
along. Quantum mechanics is a language and the key to networking / communication is language and I am on the cusp of the quantum mechanical creation of Minkowski space which is built for both communication and the establishment of structure to remember the languages of communication by bifurcating into bosons and fermions, simple facts which are explained by the fact that they work and reproduce themselves. Now I read over what I have written so far.
This is why I am fighting for scientific theology, to replace artificial selection (dogma) with natural selection (science).
Every step I take creates exhiliaration arising from progress and depression by showing me how much I have to learn.
Mass shell = mass hyperboloid: E2 = |p|
Three similar terms: formal / virtual / kinematic
From naked Gravitation to Minkowski mass shell to general relativity.
Quantum field is operator valued. Streater & Wightman (2000): PCT, Spin, Statistics and All That page 96
Am I losing my taste for reforming the Church or am I going about it in the wrong way?
'we do not know why anticommuting
[page 130]
particles are required to exist. We are glad to see that they do, the point being that none of us would be here, if there was a here, to worry about it if they didn't [page 295]. Ian Duck and E.C.G. Sudarshan (1998): Toward an understanding of the spin-statistics theorem
'. . . the full formalism of quantum field theory . . . turns out to be unnecessarily complicated.'
Anticommutation: [a, b†]+ = ab† + b†a;
Commutation: [a, b†]+ = ab† − b†a.
Can we prove the spin-statistics theorem or the statistics-spin theorem? It is not really necessary if it is a product of evolution. Can we prove the existence of a rabbit? We can observe their existence, but any proof would have to show the terabytes of data that go into an actual rabbit.
Monday 9 September 2024
Tuesday 10 September 2024
cc20_memory : spacetime cosmic memory and operating system. From the point of view of experimentation, events in classical Minkowski space are much more predictable than events in Hilbert space [so we think of Minkowski as memory and operating system].
Information is physical and memory is reality. I left this page out of cognitive cosmogenesis because it is repetitive. . . .
I am losing track of the physical arguments for the divine Universe - can cc20_memory fix this — gravitation and durability — a continued supply of positive energy adding to global stability
[page 131]
by deepening the potential well. Now we ask how electrical potential comes into existence - does Minkowski space contribute to these forces through the mass shell - or evolution? Spin-statistics has got nothing to do with fundamental forces or particles and antiparticles, stuff coming from the Dirac equation [via the Schrödinger wave equation]? There are big gaps here — for every potential there is a dynamic. The classical / quantum interface is fuelled first by gravitation.
Minkowski space creates [(comprises?) the flat patches which are connected differentially to yield] the curvature that gives Einstein gravitation and potential, a geometric thing. Can we make elecrodynamics geometric? Gravity is the paradigm for the world at the soure of cosmogenesis. How do we make a similar model for electrodynamics? Differential geometry - Wikipedia
cc19_Network creates Minkowski space.
cc20_ feeds [particles] back into quantum observation. Observation is a form of cognition [see page 14: Measurement—the interface between the Minkowski and Hilbert spaces). Feynman diagrams deal with the fact that connections between particles and people have wide spectra of interaction as we see in Shannon's concept of an alphabet of symbols. How does this create potential? - Love is cognitive potential, and the same force unites people as electrons and protons [or entropy resulting from the complexity created by networking].
So perhaps cc20_memory takes us into quantum chromodynamics and trinity again. A hadron is a trinity. What can we do with this idea? The juice is flowing again after a
[page 132]
dull day whose most exciting elements were a haircut and a phone consultation with my doctor about 2 cm thyroid nodules.
The creation of Minkowski space enables a massive increase in the entropy of the Universe [as space also increases the entropy of divinity via the Trinity]
I have figured out so many things but have so far to go but the cognitive Ansatz is feeding me, starting with Einstein's formalization of gravitation as a force free zone until it runs into the potentials of quantum mechanics, 1040 times greater. Physics and Agatha Christie are both cognitive, to be explained in cc21_matter_spirit.
As Poirot says (Dead Man's Folly page 129); 'The whole thing must tie up in somme kind of pattern, but what that pattern is he could not visualize. Tempting strands of it showed here and there but that was all.' Classical space and the mass shell impose logic on classical events, to be exposed by detectives and scientists, delving behind overt actions to detect motivations which ?? in psychological (Hilbert) space, kinematic formalism driven by naked gravitation, aka god. Agatha Christie (1956): Dead Man's Folly: A Hercule Poirot Mystery
Wednesday 11 September 2024
I am forever painting myself into corner with my dogged desire to unite physics with theology in a
[page 133]
divine Universe. I am now in the 1930s. Von Neumann has opened my path to success by showing that the world is built on a linear [periodic] kinematic Hilbert space which is capable of embracing particles and waves. Einstein has . . . cemented his rejection of quantum theory in his heartbreaking Herbert Spencer Lecture and Paul Dirac was struggling to find an explanation of the equation he found which laid the foundation of quantum field theory. Here I see an impasse because quantum field theory, because of its immense success from an engineering point of view, seems to be inconsistent with reality as I see it. I have brought my picture from a structureless initial singularity to the quantum origin of Minkowski space through the zero sum bifurcation of particles into fermions and bosons. Now we can go back to 1915 and Einstein's discovery of the field equations of general relativity and forward to the present where we find that despite the magnificent contortions of physicists general relativity, a magnificent classical field theory, seems to be forever out of the grasp of quantum physics and an impenetrable roadblock in my theological program. My answer is to come on cc20_memory. The heart of the problem is renormalization, an [impossible] child of linearity that does not fit the quadratic world of relativity. Dirac opened a door which we have yet to go entirely through. John von Neumann (2014): Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Albert Einstein (1933): On the Method of Theoretical Physics: Herbert Spencer Lecture 1933, Dirac equation - Wikipedia
[page 134]
It is heartening in a way that my intellectual problems totally overshadow my problems of accommodation and I can keep working no matter what.
Thursday 12 September 2024
My idiosyncratic take on phyics is guided by the heuristic of simplicity: Naked gravitation = empty set (∅) = fixed point theory = quantum mechanics (abstract Hilbert space): essence ≡ existence.
The chapter cc20_memory is leading us into the relationship between matter and spirit where matter is the memory that represents spirit, where the spirit is the creative quantum mechanical abstract formal element that captures energy from the eternal divine initial singularity, [naked] gravitation, to make itself real. . . . Both the creation of the Universe and human art work by this mechanism, the kinematic variety of spirit being processed by quantum mechanical intelligence to create the formal foundations of reality which is why Minkowski space is stabilized by the [special relativistic] mass shell (page 129) which may have something to do with the mass-gap in the Yang-Mills problem. Carlson, Jaffe & Wiles (2006): The Millennium Prize Problems, On shell and off shell - Wikipedia
Some would like to say that the world is built of energy / gravitation /form / psyche / soul, kinema / dynamics.
However we express it, we are dealing with
[page 135]
two independent degrees of freedom which have a relationship like people talking to one another and the conversation comprises spectra [of different messages] represented by Feynman diagrams. Rattling around looking for formal structures revealed by intelligence, theories, hypotheses, logical continua = proofs. So how do we map quantum mechanics onto proof? How do we map classical mechanics onto proof? With mechanical relays = valves = transistors.
A big deal: time is complex and linear. Time flows at the speed of light [a radical zero-sum bifurcation: Kinematic time breaks into [dynamic] Minkowski space and time via the differentiation between bosons and fermions?]
Friday 13 September 2024
So back to cc20_memory. Points to make:
1. Initial singularity is eternal empty set [the permanent foundation of the Universe].
2. Duality: formal Hilbert space, quantum mechanics, stationary genotype [changing from generation to generation].
3. Energization by bifurcation of gravitation, particles, fermion, bosons, Minkowski space.
4. Massive increase of entropy with multiplication of particles [made possible by the invention of space - fermions and the conjugate bosons that communicate between them]
5. Interplay of kinematic and dynamic (Plato, morpho-hylism)
6. From Minkowski space to general relativity.
7. Photon, boson, memory [the actual structure of the universe is nothing but memory: information is physical]
. . .
[page 136]
The average tome about relativity and quantum mechanics approximates a thousand pages of condensed mathematical detail, yet we should expect the complexity of the description to be proportional to the complexity of the situation itself. This is the heuristic of simplicity which leads me to my simplistic descriptions of a Universe whose origin is a structureless singularity, Rovelli, Weinberg, Misner, Thorne and Wheeler. Carlo Rovelli (2001): Notes for a brief history of quantum gravity, Steven Weinberg (1995): The Quantum Theory of Fields Volume I: Foundations (3 vols), Misner, Thorne & Wheeler (1973): Gravitation
This is my case for a simplistic approach to physics to match my simplistic approach to theology. Another moment of semi-despair: am I writing science or a novel? But it has to be done to ultimately stop the theocrats [who make violent claims to rule us].
Saturday 14 September 2024
Dreaming back to my Vietnam days imagining my sheer terror of being in a zero-sum kill or be killed situation as a soldier sent to war to fufill some ideological dream of a powerful politician with no care or feeling for my life. Hence my motivation to dream up theories of peace based on Cantor's notion
[page 137]
that we can create an infinite cognitive space in which to live together in peace. And a consequence: to publish my book no matter what and stop being timid and lazy. So read the Austin Macauley contract again and see what I think. Cannot afford lawyer or agent. Jeffrey Nicholls (1987): A theory of Peace
[form] : abstract, not located in space and time [like Hilbert space, dynamic form]
' The most fundamental distinction in Plato's philosophy is between the way observable objects that appear beautiful (good, just, unified, equal, big) and the one object that is what beauty (goodness, justice, unity) really is from which these many beautiful (good, just, unified, equal, big) things receive their names and correponding characteriatics . . .' Richard Kraut (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): Plato
'We are asked to transform our values by taking to heart the greater reality of the forms and the defectiveness of the corporeal world. We must recognise that the soul is a different sort of object from the body—so much so that it does not depend on the existence of the body for its functioning and can in fact grasp the nature of the forms far more easily when it is not encumbered by its attachment to anything corporeal.'
'. . . the lives we lead are to some etent a punishment ot reward for choices we made in a previous existence.'
' ' The forms are sometimes described as hypotheses'. < p>[page 138]
' the form of the good in particular is described as something of a mystery whose real nature is elusive and as yet unknown to anyone at all' (Republic).
When one compares Plato with some of the other philosophers who are often ranked with him — Aristotle, Aquinas and Kant for example — he can be recognized to be far more exploratory, incompletely systematic, elusive and playful than they. . . . many of his works therefore give their readers a strong sense of philosophy as a living and unfinished subject (perhaps one that can never be completed) to which they themselves will have to contribute.'
'One cannot be faulted, for example, if one notes in Plato's Republic Socrates argues that justice in the soul consists in each part of the soul doing its own.'
' . . . the dialogues have certain characteristics that are most easily explained by supposing that Plato is using them as vehicles for inducing his readers to become convinced (or more convinced than they already are) of certain propositions — for example that there are forms, that the soul is not corporeal, that knowledge is to be acquired only by means of study of the forms, and so on.'
'One of the most intriguing and controversial questions of his treatment of the forms, for example, is whether he concedes that his conception of the abstract entities is vulnerable to criticism, and, if so,
[page 139]
whether he revises some of the assumptions he has been making about then, or develops a more elaborate picture of them that allows him to respond to that criticism.'Reading a text is climbing along s state vector - stationary vector, moving reader.
' Plato is a political philosopher. . . . he gives expression, in several of his writings (particularly Phidias) to a yearning to escape from the tawdriness of ordinary human relations.'
'. . . despite the great sympathy Plato expresses for the desire to shed one's body and live in an incorporeal world, he devotes an enormous amount of energy to the task of understanding the world we live in, appreciating its limited beauty and improving it.'