vol VII: Notes
2013
Notes
[Notebook: DB 77 Discretion]
[Sunday 24 November 2013 - Saturday 30November 2013]
[page 20]
Sunday 24 November 2013
We take the pure activity of the divinity as given, something about which we can say nothing, and instead we study its fixed points, beginning with quantum mechanics. To date we have been working on the assumption that the cardinal of the fixed points in the divinity grows like the natural and transfinite numbers, This assumption needs to be tested against reality, of coure, which means against physical observations and quantum mechanics in the first instance. The difficulty is [it is] now fourteen billion years after God began to differentiate and so it is difficult to find the root of the tree of fixed points. Must guess, and the guess I am mostly working on is the sequence pure action (1), energy (2), momentum (3) . . .
Monday 25 November 2013
Following two paths. One is to re-establish theology on the basis that the Universe is divine; the other (and related) is to establish that the Universe is compatible with
[page 19]
divinity on the bass that it is constrained only by consistency, as we assume God to be constrained. This latter seems to be supported by the theory of quantum computation and the transfinite network constructed on the basis of quantum computation, assuming that all communication can be understood as a computed transformation.
. . .
Leave Adelaide
So we come around again to the non-locality of quantum mechanics and couple it to the continuity (non-determinism, symmetry) of gravitation. The idea while back was that the initial singularity is the ultimate hardware layer of the Universe, and since it has no structure (and so no processing) signals at this level are transmitted at 'infinite' velocity (since there is no distance, or even (possibly) time at this level. And so? Here we are back at the classical divinity, omnino simplex, no mapping and so no fixed points. Salart et al: Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance'.
The big question is what do the messages we are getting from the Universe (God) mean? And the messages we are not getting? How do they mean the Dirac equation? Because it fits the measurements.
Tuesday 26 November 2013
Momentum implies memory; Newton's first lawWednesday 27 November 2013
Thursday 28 November 2013
Friday 29 November 2013
Melbourne —> Sydney
[page 20]
The whole reason for complex numbers in quantum mechanics is the periodic nature of computation.
What is the intellectual equivalent of mechanical advantage? With my little 10t hydraulic jack I can lift a good portion of a house by substituting many metres of motion of a force of about 100N for millimetres of motion of about 100kN [more or less conserving energy as I go] Intellectually the answers to questionare found by considering the field of possibilities go at a constant rate of possibility consideration [like a chess program] the advantage comes either from long time or parallelism, many people working on the same problem.
The digital approach to quantum mechanics introduces probability through the relative phase of independent processors. A process may work if both processors are in hase and not work if they are out of phase, 'Inphase' and 'out of phase' depend upon the local resolution of the system. Two state systems, for instance, may be counted as in phase if they are within ± π/2 of eachother and out of phase otherwise, so in the case of relatively random phases they are in phase half the time and out of phase the other half.
