Notes DB 91: Divine_Gravitation_2024
Sunday 4 August 2024 - Saturday 10 Auguast 2024
Sunday 4 August 2024
[page 64]
A usual morning crisis of confidence. Can I justify the sequence of creation of the Universe listed at the beginning of Friday 2 August? It's worth a try. This makes me feel better; agenda feels good, just have to have the confidence to execute it. Meanwhile, somewhere in the middle of the night I thought of a new line of approach which is reluctant to reappear, but one that is giving weight to the notion that the first overtone of a vibrating string causes a fixed point in the middle of the string which provides a root for the timing explanation of fermions and bosons hinted at on Thursday 1 August. Bank balance 510.26
Confidence grows with every little insight as they all coalesce to create a structure. How many evolutionary insights did it take to create an animal like me, beginning way back there with the bifurcation of naked gravitation into potential and
[page 65]
kinetic energy; the discovery of fixed points by quantum mechanics and the bifurcation of particles into fermions and bosons that led to the spacetime which serves to enable the existence of infinite sets of identical particles? This paragraph seems to me to provide a rock solid base upon which to build my church, ie the genome of global peace, the doctrine of reality.
One of the most difficult things about quantum mechanics is to understand life in a formal world where there is no space and time. This is analogous to Einstein's explanation of why it took him ten years to develop general relativity. He had to realize that coordinates have no immediate metrical meaning. At the end of his paper on the field equations of gravitation he writes: ' The postulate of relativity in its most general form . . . makes space-time coordinates physically meaningless parameters'. This is the heart of quantum mechanics. Albert Einstein (1915): The Field Equations of Gravitation
Preface to paper on QFT: 'Quantum mechanics makes space=time coordinates into physically meaningless parameters' [ is this the link we are looking for between relativity and quantum mechanics, starting with naked gravitation?].
Put two fermions in a Hilbert space and their amplitudes will add up to zero.
Include Principles in Alternative_QFT - nothing comes from nothing → eternity. Creation of the world → omnipotence.
[page 66]
Revised cc05_gods_ideas, cc06_evolution
Monday 5 August 2024
The creed gives a concise account, running from creation until the end of time and the life to come, but makes no mention of the central message delivered by Jesus the Son of God and encapsulated in the parable of the Good Samaritan, love your god, love your neighbour (Luke 10:25–37).
The Creed places Christianity in the cosmic context of an empire, represented by Constantine, whose Emperors, beginning with Augustus, presented themselves as gods to strengthen the legitimacy of their imperium.
Lonergan defines metaphysics as an heuristic structure. Since the initial singularity has no structure at all, it is only constrained, like god, by consistency, and so it is in effect transcendental. This, given the nature of the singularity, is [proof that the Universe is divine].
Tuesday 6 August 2024
Alternative_QFT: 6. The emergence of quantum mechanics and the eigenvalue equation - here again we emphasize the intelligence of quantum mechanics in cognitive cosmogenesis. Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy b): Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy b)
[page 67]
Revised: cc07_ntwork_brain, cc08_trinity, cc09_create_hilbert, cc10_quantum_emerge, cc11_communication.
Wednesday 7 August 2024
[revised] cc12_hilbert_minkowski, cc13_independence, cc14_measurement.
The key to the creation of Minkowski space, as I first conceive it continues to look good after a few ups and downs, and it lies in the null geodesic followed by massless particles acting as a branch of Hilbert space stretching into Minkowski space and enabling the transfer of energy between fermions [by photons] travelling at the speed of light. The question is why are some things massive and some not and the evolutionary paradigm suggests that there has got to be a selective advantage there. The advantage seems to be the idea that I got from the Shield of the Trinity that the only way for identical divine persons to be discrete is to be at different points in space like fermions, so the discovery of fermions and space, another zero sum differentiation, enables the multiplication of individual fermions which is an advantage in the sense that it has made the Universe and the consequent massive increase in entropy possible. So space/mass seems to be the principle of individuation that converts specifically identical angels into discrete beings just as Aristotle does with forms. Massless photons, on the other hand are distinguished by frequency like the orthogonal basis states of Hilbert space
[page 68]
and those with identical frequency can enter into the same state. I need to know more quantum mechanics here that is probably available in Feynman and Weinberg.
Thursday 8 August 2024
Revised: cc15_invisibility.
Can we see time? Is it an inevitable feature of divinity like gravitation?
Massless particles cannot stop and are in a region without space and time before the advent of 3D space and they maintain that quality when massive particles appear. So photons 'decay' into electrons and positrons with both charge and magnetism. Richard Feynman & Steven Weinberg (1986): Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics: The 1986 Dirac Memorial Lectures
How do we make an electron and a positron out of a photon? [look at Dirac equation again, the creator of spacetime created by taking the 3D spacetime out of the Schrödinger equation]
Feynman and Weinberg (1986); ref notes23m09d17 etc.
F & W page 2: 'the crucial and necessary idea to wed quantum mechanics and relativity together was the existence of antiparticles. . . . Working along these lines will permit us to explain another of the grand mysteries of the world, namely the Pauli exclusion principle.
[page 69]
F & W page 3: Here the existence of particles and antiparticle permits us to ask a very simple question: if I make two pairs of electrons and positrons and I compare the amplitudes for which they annihilate directly or for when they exchange before they annihilate, why is there a minus sign? ie what is the physics that causes the mathematics?
Count Basie SBS: Music music music. Don't let anything stop you if that's what you want to be. Count Basie: Through His Own Eyes
Feynman page 4: 'In ordinary non-relativistc quantum mechanics if you have a disturbing potential U [ie a message] acting on a particle which is initially in a state of φ0 then the state will be different after the disturbance'. Dirac would write 〈χ|U|φ0〉
page 5: U1 at t1, U2 at t2,what is the amplitude for U2 to restore φ0?
Weinberg page 76: 'conservation of charge [is an internal symmetry] which physicists usually call gauge invariance.
Friday 9 August 2024
Do Feynman and Weinberg occupy a QFT echo chamber which could be usefully questions by a theological approach as I propose?
Having a rest and dealing with potential homelessness
[page 70]
and gaining confidence. Both the Feynman and Weinberg Dirac memorial lectures made me feel that quantum field theory is on the wrong track and the killer problem, represented by the outrageous wrongness of the computed cosmological constant seems to be the key to this, particularly since no one seems to really worry about it. The idea that uncertainty (ie limited resolution of action) cause energy makes no sense to me but it seems to pop up everywhere. I like the zero-sum bifurcation of gravitation so much more so I press ahead with cognitive cosmology and its various children by cognitive cosmogenesis. It is so much easier to write when I am a bit inspired, the source of the bible and probably all other durable literature, creating new formal mental species. Cosmological constant problem - Wikipedia
cc15_invisibility done.Saturday 10 August 2024
cc16_zero-energy done; cc17_gravitation
Linked in: The union of physics and theology demanded by the hypothesis that the Universe is divine demands radical revision to both disciplines. The change to theology is clear: god is no longer an invisible theological being preached by imaginative prophets of every shape. They [god] are the solid reality of ourselves and our world. Physics is closely linked by experiment to the solid reality of
[page 71]
the world, but like the ancient god, the quantum mechanical underpinnings of the world are invisible to us and our attempts to make them visible have led to an extreme distortion through the lens that we use to try to understand what is going on. We divide the world into quantum and classical. We live in the classical world, understand it intuitively, and naturally give it priority but the fact is that quantum mechanics [and gravitation are] the driver of the world. Quantum field theory conceives quantum theory as an accessory to the classical world whereas in fact the classical world is a product of the quantum world. We distort quantum mechanics by tying it to the classical spacetime world. What we must do, to understand quantum theory, is to liberate it from this constraint an set it free of the straightjacket of spacetime which is severely constricted by conservation of energy and momentum which have no meaning in the quantum world that underlies the Minkowski world. There we find pure music, unconstrained by spacetime [and relativity] and so much more interesting and beautiful for this freedom.
An idea for the new preface to cc18_fixed_points. First free ourselves from sin (the old preface) and then free ourselves from spacetime, the new vision which comes to us through music and quantum computation.