natural theology

This site is part of the The natural religion project
dedicated to developing and promoting the art of peace.

Contact us: Click to email

Notes

[Sunday 20 September 2009 - Saturday 26 September 2009]

[Notebook: DB 67: jciii]

[page 195]

Sunday 20 September 2009

Aristotle understood motion as the conservation of an underlying matter the subject of changing form. Modern physics holds that energy is neither created nor destroyed, but may appear in different forms, the difference being that while matter is passive and motion must be initiated by the first unmoved mover, energy is active and from the point of view of quantum mechanics this activity is distributed throughout the Universe rather than being concentrated in the outer heaven.

Quantum information theory holds that the processing of information in the Universe is essentially hidden from is and only yields a fraction of itself to us on observation. Real information theory, on the other hand, imagines all information to be embodied in real objects whose interactions are the universal process, and that nothing is essentially hidden, nor is the Universe essentially deterministic, requiring a deterministic underlayer (God or the Wave Function) to make

[page 196]

it work.

Monday 21 September 2009
Tuesday 22 September 2009

In telecommunications much of the cost is in the switching and with media like radio and optic fibre the cost of transmission is minimal. In nature we attribute delay to encoding and decoding [ie all process], which may be analogous to switching which is a function of the complex layers of the Universe, but we guess that at the basic hardware (energy) level the Universe has no size (space, memory) and so transmission is instantaneous, as suggested by quantum teleportation. (Nature Salart et al)

CONTINUOUS = NO MARKERS = NO MEMORY

Wednesday 23 September 2009
Thursday 24 September 2009

FQXi

What is ultimately possible in physics

Abstract

Many physicists appear to believe that the Universe began subject to very tight constraints whose evolution had led to its current state, including our own existence. This attitude is embodied in the many creation myths (or hypotheses) that have been developed over the millennia in different human cultures. Those of us descended from the Western Judaeo Christian tradition attribute the current state of the Universe to creation and guidance by an omniscient, omnipotent being commonly called God, believed to have eternally preexisted the univerae and to be

[page 197]

responsible for its current state. The only constraint on God is believed to be self consistency. Here we take the view that God and the Universe are the same reality, leading to the conclusion that theology and physics are in fact the same science and the Universe is subject to no externally imposed constraint, but is constrained only by the same requirement of self-consistency that we attribute to God.

Friday 25 September 2009
Saturday 26 September 2009
#bbinclude#="MacBook:Users:jeffrey:Sites:NT:NT_text:aBBIncludes:back_end.txt" -->

Related sites

Concordat Watch

Revealing Vatican attempts to propagate its religion by international treaty


Copyright:

You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.


Papers
Salart, Daniel, et al, "Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance'", Nature, 454, , 14 August 2008, page 861-864. 'Correlations are generally described by one of two mechanisms: either a first event influences a second one by sending information encoded in bosons or other physical carriers, or the correlated events have some common causes in their shared history. Quantum physics predicts an entirely different kind of cause for some correlations, named entanglement. This reveals itself in correlations that violate Bell inequalities (implying that they cannot be described by common causes) between space-like separated events (implying that they cannot be described by classical communication). Many Bell tests have been performed, and loopholes related to locality and detection have been closed in several independent experiments. It is still possible that a first event could influence a second, but the speed of this hypothetical influence (Einstein's 'spooky action at a distance') would need to be defined in some universal privileged reference frame and be greater than the speed of light. Here we put stringent experimental bounds on the speed of all such hypothetical influences. We performed a Bell test over more than 24 hours between two villages separated by 18 km and approximately east–west oriented, with the source located precisely in the middle. We continuously observed two-photon interferences well above the Bell inequality threshold. Taking advantage of the Earth's rotation, the configuration of our experiment allowed us to determine, for any hypothetically privileged frame, a lower bound for the speed of the influence. For example, if such a privileged reference frame exists and is such that the Earth's speed in this frame is less than 10-3 times that of the speed of light, then the speed of the influence would have to exceed that of light by at least four orders of magnitude.. back

www.naturaltheology.net is maintained by The Theology Company Proprietary Limited ACN 097 887 075 ABN 74 097 887 075 Copyright 2000-2020 © Jeffrey Nicholls