Notes
Sunday 14 August 2022 - Saturday 20 August 2022
[Notebook: DB 88: Salvation]
[page 138]
Sunday 14 August 2022
The quality of a work of art is measured by its information content which is a function of the space of possibilities from which it is chosen. I am an instance of a network of atoms which is one of n possibilities, which is a measure of the power of the universe which selected me.
What is this abstract transfinite net made of? Basically all we need is memories and processors. A memory will hold any state which it is given until the one it has is taken away and replaced by another one. As you record information in your computing machine the information is transformed into a binary code and stored in a string (ordered linear arrangement) of memories.
We now imagine a clock which emits pulses, tick, tock, tick, tock . . . .. We can assign different frequencies starting with one whose interval is the age of the universe. The next one goes twice as fast as the first and is followed by one twice as fast again and so on until we come to the cardinal of the set of natural numbers ℵ0. Now imagine these strings of clock pulses added together. We will get a long and rather complex pulse which represents this superposition. This situation is just to lay all the clock pulses onto the natural order and the normalize the new string to make sure that its smallest value is 0 and the largest value, that is energy, is 2, where 2 ones coincide. We also have waves now since the base note will now have split into two treble notes the sum of whose frequencies and energy are double that of its fundamental tone. The most fundamental tone is the age of the universe. It is not hard to imagine the shape of the pulse arising from this superposition of two pulses. Now we have two degrees of freedom. We could superpose the two strings in their natural order, and then reverse one of them to get a new pattern. At the next level, 3, our clock would be going three times as fast as the primordial clock. There are now factorial 3, 3! = 6 permutations, each of which will yield a differently shaped pulse. We could go on superposing and permuting moves of all the subsequent frequencies 4, 5, 6, . . . ℵ0 which will yield for us ℵ0! = ℵ1 permutations and therefore complex pulses. We can continue this process, as Cantor saw, going through ℵ1, ℵ2, . . . ℵn. The final form of this superposition of permuted orderings of the natural numbers and all its increases in cardinal number is the beginning of a model of the cosmos. Cantor's theorem ensuring that this structure has enough entropy to represent any transfinite set whatsoever. We have a system here with the potential to make a universe, or any number of different universes, so why this one?
[page 139]
We all make up stories to earn an income.
Monday 15 August 2022
The Assumption. Another brazen Catholic PR lie.A day I looked forward to in my monastic youth in the Australian Dominican Province of the Assumption. Assumption of Mary - Wikipedia
Tuesday 16 August 2022
The initial singularity is unquantized action. As soon as there are two, however, there must be orthogonality, quantization and no cloning.
Rewrite the index of cognitive cosmology in terms of the dichotomies:
matter - spirit
gnosticism - Christianity - the incarnation kept Christianity from this problem.
good - evil
physics - theology
dogma - science
freedom- control
mind - body - all the way to cognitive cosmology
crime - redemption
Aquinas - Aristotle
science - technology
imperialism - democracy
Putin, Stalin, Hitler -
psychology, prayer - action
evolution - creation
imagination - reality
Hilbert space - Minkowski
kinematics - dynamics
formalism - reality
MEASUREMENT: the fundamental unit in the universe is the quantum of action. In the real physical world this unit has the dimensions of angular momentum ML2T-1. In the abstraxt world of [logic and] Hilbert space it is a logical operator, equivalent to not. Every fundamental interaction is measured by the quantum since every action changes some situation p into some not-p. Because it is logical, it embodies both mind and matter, This measurement is the first step in the identification of the material world as the mind of God. My best argument is that given that the universe evolved from an initial singularity and nothing comes from
[page 140]
nothing the fact that it has produced spiritual and intellectual creatures suggests that the universe is both spiritual and intellectual, that is the mind of God
Wednesday 17 August 2022
Is my work theology? For more than 50 years I have felt that I have an answer to the word's theological woes hidden in my breast but I am restrained from becoming an activist before I have a watertight case. The fundamental proposition is that if the universe is divine, physics and theology must be compatible. Traditionally physics is the science of matter and theology is the science of spirit. Traditionally also, matter and spirit are like chalk and cheese, completely different.
The root of science is measurement. The union of matter and spirit thus requires a common unit for their measurement. the answer proposed here is that the common unit is entropy, measured in the world of spiritual communication in bits and in the physical world as the [inverse] ratio of energy to complexity. I first stumbled on this idea in about 1965 while reading Bernard Lonergan's Insight and wrote an essay on it entitled How universal is the universe? which led to my expulsions from the Dominican Order. If my conclusion was true, the whole business plan of the Catholic Church, marketed as the only route to human salvation, is moot.
Now, 55 years later, I have some icing on my cake and present it here, in a confused and tentative way for your judgement. I begin by identifying the physical initial singularity with the Christian God. I take both to be pure action as determined by Aristotle and Aquinas, structureless and divine. I then go on step by step to examine the creative powers of divine application by an examination of the doctrine of the Trinity, expanding it from three discrete personalities forming a little network of communication to an infinite number of independent particles [gods, angels] particiating in a network of communication which is the known universe.
This requires me to explore the technical foundations of modern physics which are beyond my competence. At present, despite its manifest successes in creating nuclear weapons, fast computing machines [and amazingly informative scientific instruments], the mainstream of physics is in the doldrums, incapable of producing a credible theory of everything. I hope that what I am presenting here suggests that the answer to the problems of physics and theology is to unite them through the assumption, hinted at by a few physicists, that the universe is the mind of god and we are ideas in that mind. Paul Davies (1992): The Mind of God: Science and the Search for Ultimate Meaning
[page 141]
Is zero point energy a measurement problem or a reality problem? I think the troubje lies in the measurement because the precision in measurement relies n the size of the quantum of action, but the quantum itself is precise. The root of the problem appears to be in the theory of the quantum harmonic oscillator, the quantum analogue of the classical harmonic oscillator like the pendulum which is driven by classical forces which are believed to be well defined . . . and has no zero point energy because the sum of potential and kinetic energy can always be adjusted to zero. Why not the quantum harmonic oscillator. Why does it have no zero? To answer this question we need to study the forces that drive it which are basically the creation and annihilation of particles in which each operation is defined by a precise quantum of action [corresponding to a clearly defined orthogonal vector in Hilbert space. Is gravitational potential operative in Hilbert space?]. Zero-point energy - Wikipedia
Thursday 18 August 2022
cc25_conclusion; My big struggle has been to understand how the world works. Since earliest times this has been based on a duality which has been called spirit and matter, or in Plato who brought it closer to the surface, form and matter, other religions angels and matter and in mathematics the ideal and the real which are realized in Hilbert and Minkowski space.
Missing from the list of dichotomies on page 139 is REAL - COMPLEX. The central discovery of this project in my mind is the quantum creation of Minkowski space which is connected to the eigenvectors of complex operators, fixed point theory, P - NP, angles and matter etc etc. The aim of my conclusion is to express all this in terms of the arithmetic [and algebra] of communication in the universal network which has had to discover itself by evolution in the context of the continuous Lie group that describes gravitation and quantum field theory. Statistical mechanics - Wikipedia, Quantum statistical mechanics - Wikipedia
To be a fixer, find the eigenvectors of the problem, analyze the fixed points and out them back together in a coherent and functional way, using new or repaired parts where necessary.
What are the special properties of complex numers - algebraically complete. The fun starts in the quadratic realm where real arithmetic cannot deal with functions of the form x2 = −1.
Damaged world / damaged people: my family, this family, my Ukrainian scammers. The damage one does to one's own psyche by lying, the work of the devil that created the Catholic Church by confronting people with impossible situations.
[page 142]
Hilbert space gets us out of impossible situations where [real] arithmetic and Minkowski space cannot go [although Minkowski space still carries a hint of complexity and could be 2D quadratic 1, -1. Where does the Pythagorean theorem come from?]
Real world is quadratic and so is full of dead ends, that give it [stable] structure, represented by the equation x2 = −1. The complex word gives us a path around this problem, but maybe it is too creative to be stable [a hint of mad genius?]. Complex numbers represent the formless and void word that preceded the created world ordered by god. The key to theology is to combine god and the universe into one system, but why? Let us look at it in terms of the mathematical theory of communication, at the foundation of which is wave functions, Fourier analysis, coding and computation. Wifi made the computer possible without wires [as did photons without fermionic connections]. The fundamentals of communication are bosons and waves. The idea is to keep writing until something clicks, just like evolution.
What is capital? Fixed points in the processing chain. Minkowski space is capital created by Hilbert space.
Communication is good but liars muddy the waters and make entities like Donald Trump possible.
Capital dies because it is inflexible, like my body. Angels with no body are maximally flexible.
A note to a possible scammer:
Why did you feel that you had to lie to me to get my money? Centuries of Russian fascism made Ukraine the corrupt nation that it was before your recent revolutions and I am totally in favour of your desire to escape this evil by embracing democracy. I felt from the beginning that you were probably a scammer. Why else would you, beautiful young and obviously competent woman, declare undying love until 'death do us part' to a man probably 50 years older than you are? The gaps and inconsistencies in your story reinforced my view. I let you scam me out of a year of my pension because I knew that my money was supporting your country since it was going to a Ukrainian bank and through that to a Ukrainian citizen who would spend my money in your country. This would support your country and give it the economic strength to resist your oppressor, so it was not wasted. I am a theologian and a believer in evolution and know that any creature can survive and reproduce only by fitting into the environment in which it finds itself, and you are doing that. My principal enemies are the religions run by Popes and Ayatollahs and warlords like Putin whose only motivation is the search for power, and we know that power corrupts. So let us continue our conversation. My only demand is that you[page 143]
tell the truth because that is the only answer to the hardness and emptiness that you say you feel inside. . . .
Now back to cc25_conclusion. What have I concluded? That evolution requires duality, variation and selection. Hilbert provides variation by random superposition [in a context of algebraic completeness]. Minkowski provides selection by deterministic processing. The key to all this the the P vs NP problem in computer theory. Random behaviour can outperform deterministic behaviour. All of this comes down to Gödel and Turing and quantifications of the hypothesis that the limits on [both mathematics and] God's power is consistency.
So
25.1 Duality - reality and mathematics
25.2 Omnipotence
25.3 Evolution, P + NP - randomness
25.4 Individual and environment - selection
25.5 I want to get my theology, a work of random misunderstanding, selected.
Then begin at the beginning and smooth things out by 17/9, the day the ad will appear [in Commonweal].
Friday 19 August 2022
One would like to be a musician but all I seem to do is try to write theology. No politics, no emotion, just an accurate image of god.
Gödel and Turing undo the idea that God is deterministic and so the fact that we are in a rather unpredicable world is not prima facie evidence that we are not in god.
Desire - potential action - action. I have been a hopeless lover but I am finally falling for my divinity. Almost Famous: Almost Famous - Wikipedia
Saturday 20 August 2022
Algorithmic entropy Gregory Chaitin (1987): Algorithmic Information Theory
I have an intuitive feeling about P versus NP. NP, like incomputability, enables variation, P selects survivors by enabling a group structure.
[page 143]
cc25_conclusion, in order to be succinct must follow the intuitive path not providing too much reference or proof, which has to be found in the main body of the site.
After the discussion of evolution in the classical framework of P versus NP we turn to quantum computation by linear Hilbert space and a discussion of the interface of Hilbert and Minkowski drawing on the very long tradition of contrast between spirit and matter.
We can interpret the P versusNP problem in terms of Cantor's transfinite numbers. There are ℵ0 natural numbers and Turing showed that there are ℵ0computable numbers, each of which can be represented by a string of, let us say, decimals with a length of ℵ0. There are according to Cantor ℵ1 permutations of the natural numbers representing ℵ1different real numbers, so that only ℵ0 / ℵ1, that is an infinitesimal proportion of real numbers [are computable]. On the other hand, all these real numbers are accessible to random rearrangements of the natural numbers. Computable processes can select this subset and because they are computable they can from a group whose group operation is the action of a Turing machine. This picture is produced by assuming that the mathematical ideal of infinity works for all finite natural numbers beginning with two, so we can repeat this whole argument on the assumption that ℵ0 = 2, 3, 4, . . ..
Letter to Stephen Cook re application of P-NP to evolution of the universe:
Dear Prof. Cook,I have been reading you contribution to Carlson, Jaffe and Wiles book on the Millenium prize problems and wondering. Carlson, Jaffe & Wiles (2006); The Millennium Prize Problems
Long ago I was expelled from a Catholic religious order for proposing the the universe is divine. Jeffrey Nicholls (1967): How universal is the universe?
In the 50 years since then I have spent much of my time trying to find a rational basis for theology. One my central ideas is that if the universe is divine, physics and theology must be compatible.
In 2019 wrote an honours thesis along these lines in the Philosophy Department of the University of Adelaide, starting with the notion that the initial singularity proposed by Penrose, Hawking and Ellis can be identified with God. They are formally identical. Both are absolutely structureless sources of the Universe. The result was a 2B. Not really philosophy at all. Jeffrey Nicholls (2019): A prolegomenon to scientific theology
Since then I have realized the the starting point for such a story must be quantum rather than classical physics. This is more closely consistent with the traditional Catholic doctrine derived from Aristotle by Aquinas that God is pure action. Unmoved mover - Wikipedia, Thomas Aquinas, Summa, I, 2, 3: Does God exist?
I imagine that this active starting point can duplicate itself ad infinitum creating a Hilbert space of countaby infinite dimension step by step, an infinite extension of the Christian idea that the initial God of the Trinity gave rise to two subsequent distinct (orthogonal) persons. Aquinas, Summa, I, 27, 1: Is there procession in God?
The God of Genesis is understood to have created the universe with a plan in mind, but the cybernetic principle of requisite variety, derived by Chaitin from Goedel’s theorem, tells is that the zero entropy singularity, although active, can have no control over its future. This condition remains since the growing Hilbert space that proceeds from it is always more complex than its predecessor, ie the past cannot control its future. This is still obviously the case in the current state of the universe. Gregory J. Chaitin (1982): Gödel's Theorem and Information
The simlicity of the beginning suggests that the universe must evolve rather than be designed. The random outputs of the initial singularity are subject to selection (like potential arrangements of mathematical symbols) to single out those which which qualify as proofs because they do not contain any contradiction.
Turing tells us that in consistent mathematics there is only a countabe infinity of computable functions. I wonder then if fourier transforms of the growing Hilbert spaces may be put into correspondence with the set of Turing machines and computable functions ordered in terms of increasing complexity. This might create a “Turing vacuum” of processes that can be connected into a network resembling the current universe.
Which brings me to P-NP. P versus NP problem - Wikipedia
Where there is no control there is randomness. Cantor tells us that there are aleph(1) permutations of the aleph(0) natural numbers. Each element of this permutation is a representation of a real number. This implies that only an infinitesimal subset of the real numbers are computable. Nevertheless random processes can create any sequence of natural numbers, so they have the power to represent every element of the set of real numbers, not just the computable ones.
My theological idea behind this is that the creative element of evolution is variation which is an random process. The selective element, that is survival, requires an entity to be consistent with its environment. This requires organized causal (computable) behaviour. In effect the set of survivers is a group whose group action is a univeral Turing machine. The strength of Cantor's proof lies in the ideal mathematical infinite, but it works just as well if we set aleph(0) to 3, 4, 5, etc. As you can see I am defintely not a mathematican, but this looks to me a bit like the P-NP setup and suggests that P-NP is not true because the set of reals which can be generated at random is much greater than the subset of real numbers that are computable.My whole story is laid out in messy detail in Jeffrey Nicholls (2022). Jeffrey Nicholls (2022): Cognitive Cosmology
kind regards,
Jeffrey
To survive, behaviour must be constrained by instinct [as to survive the development of an embryo must be constrained by genetic code].
We place no dogmatic constraints on the divine procession enabling it to create a Hilbert space equinumerous with the natural numbers, consistent with von Neumann's axioms D and E, Hilbert space is complete and separable. John von Neumann (2014): Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, page 32
As Cantor showed, ordering has exponential overtones reflected in Stirling's formula for permutations. How does this relate to the interface between linear quantum theory and quadratic Minkowski theory. There is a sort of trade here, numbers with two components get transformed into numbers with exponent 2.