natural theology

We have just published a new book that summarizes the ideas of this site. Free at Scientific Theology, or, if you wish to support this project, buy at Scientific Theology: A New Vision of God

Contact us: Click to email
vol VII: Notes

2015

Notes

[Sunday 15 November 2015 - Saturday 21 November 2015]

[Notebook: DB 79: Galileo Wins]

[page 141]

Sunday 15 November 2015

[page 142]

Monday 16 November 2015

Radix pacis: Peace <—> cooperation
cooperation <—> shared goals and methods
shared gals and methos <—> common descent
common decent <—> one god / one world

Tuesday 17 November 2015

Back to Auyang for another attempt at understanding the world. The fundamental problem for me now is the interface between special relativity which explains the local structure of space-time and quantum theory. Veltman takes the view, based on the momentum representation of quantum mechanics, that Lorentz transformations have to be carried into Hilbert space where they become very complex because of the infinite dimensional feature of Hilbert space necessary to deal with a continuum of momentum states. Intuitively I don't like this for a number of reasons: Veltman: Diagrammatica, Auyang: How is Quantum Field Theory Possible?

1. I feel that there is no information in a real continuum or symmetry, so that the infinite dimensional momentum representation seems to an introduction of unnecessary complexity founded on the point set model of the continuum, which maintains that we can construct a continuum from discrete points, something of a contradiction.

2. I feel that quantum mechanics describes energy states and time frequencies, and attempts to apply it to space are misguided. Part of this problem is the assumption that time and action are continuous, whereas they are clearly quantized by the quantum of action. The events in Hilbert space are spatially local and there is no easy way to tie a Hilbert space and the events described by it to a given point in space The problem is compounded by the uncertainty relation that holds that definite momentum means no spatial localization.

[page 143]

3. Lorentz transformations are real and so can only apply to real particles. The only way Lorentz transformations can be applied to wave functions in space time is by their modification [from the point of view of different inertial observers] of the domain to which the field equations are applied, and this does not seem very natural. Auyang deals with this problem with fibre bundles, seeing points in spacetime as the local addresses for complex tangent and vector bundles.

4. Auyang, and physicists in general, like many religions, seem to attribute greater reality to the invisible fields than the visible particles. Wigner (Auyang page 5) complains (?) "The principal difficulty is, rather, that it [quantum mechanics] elevates the measurement, that is the observation of a quantity, to a basic concept of the theory." The old theistic ideas dating from Newton and prior that the world is an 'objective' deterministic automaton seem to be echoed here, and since what we see depends on how we look we are obliged to postulate a deterministic underlayer which is somehow degraded into throws of variously loaded dice when we come to observe. This is to overlook Shannon's discovery that a message coded with maximum entropy is indistinguishable from noise. Claude Shannon: Communication in the presence of noise

5. Classical and quantum theory identify determinacy and continuity whereas Turing and Shannon tell us that error resistance and logical determinism require discreteness. Auyang page 5: 'Quantum theories include irreducible terms about observed or measured results. These experiential terms threaten objectivity because experiences are intrinsically subjective.

Auyang page 6: 'A proper interpretation of quantum theories calls for a general concept of the objective world that adequately accommodates both classical and quantum objects.' Not necessarily, everything is classical and quantum theory is an illusion created by the recursive nature of computation and the invisibility of uninterrupted computation.

Particle — symmetry, algorithm.

[page 144]

Fibre bundles: base space M = {0, 1}

Auyang page 7: 'I start with the premise that quantum field theory conveys knowledge of the microscopic world and regard the general meaning of objects as a question whose answer lies within the theory. This work asks quantum theory to demonstrate its own objectivity by extracting and articulating the general concept of objects it embodies.'

6. Given that the Universe starts off as a structureless singularity, the standard model, apart from ignoring gravitation, gives no explanation of the huge number and relative variety of particles that are observed in the universe. We need some structure of relationships to explain these numbers, whereas physicists are inclined to pull manifolds with an infinite number of particles out of a hat with no explanation. Newton attributed the fixed structure of the universe to God and modern physics more of less does the same, attributing the structure and fine tuning of the world to some prior creative power. The notion that the universe is divine requires us to explain every step from 1 to countably infinite. My favourite is the reduced transfinite series, 2, 4, 16, 216, 2216 etc.

Wednesday 18 November 2015

Auyang page 8: Science does not and cannot put us in the position of God.' Meaning? Why Not? We are local gods.

Mind, like quantum events, is not passive but active, encoding and decoding.

Thursday 19 November 2015

Auyang page 11: Einstein; ' "One may say the eternal mystery of

[page 145]

the world is its comprehensibility." ' This is n mystery if we recognize that the whole world is a communication system which has evolved to partition itself by different encodings which are comprehensible to orthogonal sets of communicators.

Auyang page 12: 'Consider the quantum postulate that the state vector of an isolated physical system contains a complete description of its characteristics.' How is this encoded? Is the state vector an ordered set of data?

page 13: 'This work presents a parallel analysis of the conceptual structure of quantum field theory and our everyday thinking. . . . I try to articulate the categorical framework of objective knowledge of which quantum field theory is one instance and common sense another.' Maybe there is no' objective knowledge' in a network, everything is a relationship between two systems that share a code (language).

page 14: '. . . the notion of observer in quantum mechanics is shown to be an illusion arising from the impoverished categorical framework that forces us to divide the world into observer and observed.' Yes all observers are observed and all observeds are observers, the root of the invisibility theorem.

'Space-time is the objective structure of the world by which things are individuated.; hence the concept of entities presupposes the concept of space-time.' We can go deeper and say individuality is caused by orthogonality, ie non-communication, ie incompatible codes. [fermions?]

'Relational properties intrinsic to each entity reconcile the conventions of predication for various entities and effectively cement the universe without sacrificing the individuality of the entities.' This appears to assume that the entities exist independently of their relationship to one another. See 6. above.

[page 146]

Auyang page 14: 'The replacement of universal conventions of predication by physically significant relations is the major logical step in the development of interacting field theories.' ie real relationships mediated by communication.

Friday 20 November 2015

page 17: '. . . we have no satisfactory criterion that separates quantum from classical systems.

Saturday 21 November 2015

Auyang page 26: Geometry: naming (measuring) spaces with numbers.

WWJD: What would Jesus do?

Copyright:

You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.

Further reading

Books

Click on the "Amazon" link below each book entry to see details of a book (and possibly buy it!)

Auyang, Sunny Y., How Quantum Theory is possible, Oxford University Press 1995 Jacket: 'Quantum field theory (QFT) combines quantum mechanics with Einstein's special theory of relativity and underlies elementary particle physics. This book presents a philosophical analysis of QFT. It is the first treatise in which the philosophies of space-time, quantum phenomena and particle interactions are encompassed in a unified framework.' 
Amazon
  back
Bergson, Henri, Creative Evolution, General Books LLC 2009 'Long absent from the center of discussion in Western philosophy, Bergson has recently made a reappearance. The Centennial Series of his works undertaken by Palgrave Macmillan thus comes at an opportune time, making it possible for those interested in Bergson's ideas t have access to newly annotated versions of several of his chief writings, freshly introduced and discussed. It is particularly good to see the republication of Mind-Energy, a treasure trove of Bergsonian insights long out of print.' - Pete A.Y. Gunter, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of North Texas 
Amazon
  back
Cheney, Margaret, Tesla: Man out of Time, Touchstone 2001 Jacket: 'In Tesla: Man Out of Time Margaret Cheneyexplores the brilliant and prescient mind of the twentieth century's greatest scientist and inventor.  
Amazon
  back
Chrsitie, Agatha, Taken at the Flood, Collins Crime 2000  
Amazon
  back
Fortun, Mike, and Herbert J Bernstein, Muddling Through: Pursuing Science and Truths in the Twenty-First Century, Counterpoint 1998 Amazon editorial review: 'Does science discover truths or create them? Does dioxin cause cancer or not? Is corporate-sponsored research valid or not? Although these questions reflect the way we're used to thinking, maybe they're not the best way to approach science and its place in our culture. Physicist Herbert J. Bernstein and science historian Mike Fortun, both of the Institute for Science and Interdisciplinary Studies (ISIS), suggest a third way of seeing, beyond taking one side or another, in Muddling Through: Pursuing Science and Truths in the 21st Century. While they deal with weighty issues and encourage us to completely rethink our beliefs about science and truth, they do so with such grace and humor that we follow with ease discussions of toxic-waste disposal, the Human Genome Project, and retooling our language to better fit the way science is actually done.' 
Amazon
  back
Grgin, Emile, The Algebra of Quantions: A Unifying Number System for Quantum Mechanics and Relativity, AuthorHouse 2005 Amazon Product Description 'Quantum mechanics and relativity have been in structural conflict for eighty years. This work shows that the incompatibility in question stems only from the assumption that their unification must be based on the field of complex numbers. Dropping this assumption, one can derive a simple mathematical structure which subsumes both theories as special cases. While the idea of generalizing the number system of quantum mechanics to make structural room for relativity is very old, no attempt has been successful in the past. The novelty brought out in the present work is based on a self-evident observation: there is no reason to expect the development of mathematics and physics to be synchronized in a manner that would keep the former forever one step ahead of the latter. More specifically, if a new number system seems to be needed in physics, there is no reason to believe that this system already belongs to our mathematical heritage.This observation changes the nature of the problem from 'finding' a unifying number system among the algebras already studied by mathematicians, to 'discovering' it ab initio from the requirement that it should lead to a structural merging of quantum mechanics and relativity. The solution, named "algebra of quantions", is derived in this book from several viewpoints, together with proofs of its mathematical uniqueness. Its physical relevance stems from the fact that the Standard Model depends less on observations if formulated over the quantions. This work is a philosophical and technical introduction to the algebra of quantions, to quantionic analysis, and to quantionic field equations.' 
Amazon
  back
Latifa, My Forbidden face: Growing Up Under the Taliban: A Young Woman's Story, Miramax 2003 Amazon review From Booklist 'Latifa was only 16 when the Taliban overran Kabul, changing her life dramatically. On the morning of September 26, 1996--the day the Taliban took Kabul--Latifa, her sister, Soraya, and their father drove to Aryana Square and saw the body of the murdered former president, Najibullah. The Taliban began issuing edicts, forbidding women to leave their houses without a close male relative to escort them; forcing them to wear chadris, which cover their entire bodies; and refusing to allow them to work. Latifa, Soraya, and their mother suffered greatly, falling into depression. Their mother, a doctor, continued to see patients secretly, and Latifa eventually started an underground school for girls, an action that put both her and her students at great risk. Latifa and her parents left Afghanistan to be interviewed by the French magazine Elle, but when they tried to return, they discovered that the Taliban had declared them enemies of the state. A moving firsthand account with a real sense of immediacy.' Kristine Huntley Copyright © American Library Association. 
Amazon
  back
Park, David Allen, Introduction to the Quantum Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Company 1992  
Amazon
  back
Polanyi, Michael, and Amaryta Sen (foreword), The Tacit Dimension, University Of Chicago Press 2009 Amazon product description: '“I shall reconsider human knowledge by starting from the fact that we can know more than we can tell,” writes Michael Polanyi, whose work paved the way for the likes of Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. The Tacit Dimension argues that tacit knowledge—tradition, inherited practices, implied values, and prejudgments—is a crucial part of scientific knowledge. Back in print for a new generation of students and scholars, this volume challenges the assumption that skepticism, rather than established belief, lies at the heart of scientific discovery.' 
Amazon
  back
Veltman, Martinus, Diagrammatica: The Path to the Feynman Rules, Cambridge University Press 1994 Jacket: 'This book provides an easily accessible introduction to quantum field theory via Feynman rules and calculations in particle physics. The aim is to make clear what the physical foundations of present-day field theory are, to clarify the physical content of Feynman rules, and to outline their domain of applicability. ... The book includes valuable appendices that review some essential mathematics, including complex spaces, matrices, the CBH equation, traces and dimensional regularization. ...' 
Amazon
  back
Links
Active intellect - Wikipedia, Active intellect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Active intellect or agent intellect is a term used in philosophy to refer to the formal (morphe) aspect of the intellect (nous), in accordance with the theory of hylomorphism. . . . Aristotle: the active intellect was the subject of much intense discussion in medieval philosophy. The idea is first encountered in Aristotle's De Anima, in which he discusses the human mind and distinguishes between the active and passive intellects.[1] Aristotle says that the passive intellect receives the intelligible forms of things, but that the active intellect is required to make the potential knowledge into actual knowledge, in the same way that light makes potential colors into actual colors. back
Annabel Crabb, The fight between being and nothingness, 'Several weeks ago, the Thatcher archive finally released the speech the Iron Lady had been planning to give at that 1984 conference. It was an unprecedentedly savage attack on the Labour Party, laced with personal abuse and contumely. The speech she actually gave, hastily rewritten in the rubble, was eminently more gracious. Even Britain's immortal political warrior knew that in the face of a shared new enemy, old enemies must sometimes call a truce.' back
Ari Mattes, Reflections of Paris: technics and terrorism in Vision Culture, 'The entire event-complex is, of course, deeply sad for the families of the dead – all of the dead, including the families of the perpetrators – and this, hopefully, elicits the empathy of those not directly affected. But the event’s revelation of the inability of the majority of public figures to think in terms of systems and history – to think dynamically, and to see and understand the relationships between different forces, political, economic, cultural and geographic – is a source of profound despair regarding the global future.' back
Carol Giacomo, What the Saudis Miss When They Focus on Iran, 'I visited the region last month, shortly after a gunman linked to an Islamic State affiliate killed five people at a meeting hall associated with a mosque in the city of Shaihat. On Wednesday in the same city, gunmen killed two members of the Saudi security forces. Many Shiite residents, already alienated from the government, are fearful. “They feel they are being targeted for their faith,” a Saudi journalist said. The Saudis’ Wahhabi version of Islam, which underpins the conservative government and society, considers Shiites infidels, and anti-Shiite propaganda is common.' back
George Monbiot, There's a population crisi alright> But probably not the one you think, 'So let’s turn to a population crisis over which we do have some influence. I’m talking about the growth in livestock numbers. Human numbers are rising at roughly 1.2% a year, while livestock numbers are rising at around 2.4% a year. By 2050 the world’s living systems will have to support about 120m tonnes of extra humans, and 400m tonnes of extra farm animals. Raising these animals already uses three-quarters of the world’s agricultural land. A third of our cereal crops are used to feed livestock: this may rise to roughly half by 2050. More people will starve as a result, because the poor rely mainly on grain for their subsistence, and diverting it to livestock raises the price.' back
Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature, Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature, 'The primary premise of the Alliance is that in order to insure an environmentally sustainable future, humans must reorient themselves from an exploitative and ultimately self-destructive relationship with nature, to one that honors the deep interrelation of all life and contributes to the health and integrity of the natural environment. An essential step in achieving this is to create a system of jurisprudence that sees and treats nature as a fundamental, rights bearing entity and not as mere property to be exploited at will.' back
Henri Bergson - Wikipedia, Henri Bergson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Henri-Louis Bergson (. . . 18 October 1859–4 January 1941) was a major French philosopher, influential especially in the first half of the 20th century.' back
Jim Holt, Nothing Ventured, 'In 1935, around the time he began proclaiming that Hitler would rescue the German people from their forgetfulness of Being, Heidegger declared "Why is there something rather than nothing?" to be the deepest and most far-reaching of all questions. Each of us, he claimed, is "grazed...by its hidden power" at least once in our lives, whether we realize it or not: The question looms in moments of great despair, when things tend to lose all their weight and all meaning becomes obscured....It is present in moments of rejoicing, when all things around us are transfigured and seem to be there for the first time, as if it might be easier to think they are not than to understand that they are and are as are. The question is upon us in boredom, when we are equally removed from despair and joy, and everything about us seems so hopelessly commonplace that we no longer care whether anything is or is not... ' back
Joshua Robertson, Sex abuse victimes struggle for justive in Brisbane's web of powerful interests, 'Archbishop Phillip Aspinall has signalled the church will refund considerable fees paid to St Paul’s by victims of abuse by Lynch and Knight. But Aspinall indicated to the commission that the church, even when it was willing to take a less combative tack with victims in legal proceedings, had scarcely any more opportunity to do so while “trapped” by the terms of their insurance contracts. Aspinall said there was an inherent conflict when insurers with commercial interests acted for a school or a church that wished to “express care and concern for the survivor without voiding its insurance cover”. Worse still, he saw no way “that conflict can be resolved”. This means that churches and schools, regardless of any willingness to own up to their failures, remain captive to commercial imperatives that turn the handling of historical sexual abuse complaints into a ' back
Kamel Daoud, Saudi Arabia, an ISIS That Has Made It, 'Saudi Arabia is a Daesh that has made it. The West’s denial regarding Saudi Arabia is striking: It salutes the theocracy as its ally but pretends not to notice that it is the world’s chief ideological sponsor of Islamist culture. The younger generations of radicals in the so-called Arab world were not born jihadists. They were suckled in the bosom of Fatwa Valley, a kind of Islamist Vatican with a vast industry that produces theologians, religious laws, books, and aggressive editorial policies and media campaigns.' back
Laila Lalami, When terror strikes, Saudi Arabia evades responsibility, 'When I was a child in Morocco, no clerics told me what to do, what to read or not read, what to believe, what to wear. And if they did, I was free not to listen. Faith was more than its conspicuous manifestations. But things began to change in the 1980s. It was the height of the Cold War and Arab tyrants saw an opportunity: they could hold on to power indefinitely by repressing the dissidents in their midst – most of them secular leftists – and by encouraging the religious right wing, with tacit or overt approval from the US and other Western allies. Into the void created by the decimation of the Arab world's secular left, the Wahhabis stepped in, with almost unlimited financial resources. Wahhabi ideas spread throughout the region, not because they have any merit – they don't – but because they were and remain well funded. We cannot defeat IS without defeating the Wahhabi theology that birthed it. And to do so would require spending as much effort and money in defending liberal ideas.' back
Luke Kemp, Explainer: how the OECD agreement dealsanother blow to coal worldwide, 'The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries have agreed to limit subsidies for the export of inefficient coal-fired power plant technologies. Export credit funding will be limited to coal-fired power generators using only the most efficient, and least polluting, “ultra-supercritical” technologies. The deal will come into force in January 2017 and be reviewed in 2019. . . . Australia unfortunately continued its role as a climate laggard by negotiating for the inclusion of a clause allowing for exceptions. back
Pat McConnell, 21st Century bank fraud demands a new generation of IT experts, 'It would seem that the world is vastly infested with dodgy code, a lot of it hiding behind the shield of ‘intellectual property’, ‘commercial in confidence’ etc etc. Code functions very like law, and despite the efforts of many dodgy lawmakers in Australia and elsewhere, it is a well established principle that the text of laws will be publicly available and that the High Court has the last say on what the words actually mean and whether the meaning is constitutionally acceptable. The law, in other words, is ‘open source’. Maybe it is time to implement this principle in all code which effects human health, safety and security, the stability of the financial system and in fact everything which impacts on the public welfare. If all this code was open source, millions of skilled eyes could go over it and alert the rest of it to deliberate or unintentional dodginess. It would seem, for instance, that there are forests of errors in the code employed by our governments in their efforts to get into the cybercentury while being too stingy to employ properly qualified software engineers to design and build their systems, eg http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/consumer-security/taxpayer-records-exposed-by-serious-ato-mygov-security-flaw-20151117-gl1kex' Jeffrey Nichols comment back
Tamara Tulich, National security bill opens the door to expanded control orders and secret evidence, What is new in the anti-terror context is legislation that allows the courts to rely on secret evidence in control order proceedings. . . . UK Supreme Court justice Lord Kerr made the following comments in a case about secret evidence: The central fallacy of the argument, however, lies in the unspoken assumption that, because the judge sees everything, he is bound to be in a better position to reach a fair result. That assumption is misplaced. To be truly valuable, evidence must be capable of withstanding challenge. I go further. Evidence which has been insulated from challenge may positively mislead.' back
Ted Lefroy and Benjamin Richardson, We quibble over 'lawfare', but the law is not protecting species properly anyway, 'An alternative vision that evokes Christopher Stone’s ideal is beginning to find legal expression in some countries, such as New Zealand, where a long dispute between the government and Maori over management of a major river concluded in 2012 with an historic agreement that the Whanganui River is a legal person, with its own rights. Two guardians, one appointed by the local Maori iwi and the other by the government, will protect the river’s interests forever.' back
The Ant and the Grasshopper - Wikipedia, The Ant and the Grasshopper - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Synopsis The fable concerns a grasshopper who has spent the warm months singing away while the ant (or ants in some editions) worked to store up food for winter. When winter arrives, the grasshopper finds itself dying of hunger, and upon asking the ant for food is only rebuked for its idleness. The story is used to teach the virtues of hard work and saving, and the perils of improvidence. Some versions of the fable state a moral at the end, along the lines of: "Idleness brings want", "To work today is to eat tomorrow" or "It is best to prepare for the days of necessity". back
William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar Act 4, Scene 3, 'BRUTUS Under your pardon. You must note beside, That we have tried the utmost of our friends, Our legions are brim-full, our cause is ripe: The enemy increaseth every day; We, at the height, are ready to decline. There is a tide in the affairs of men, Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat; And we must take the current when it serves, Or lose our ventures.' back

www.naturaltheology.net is maintained by The Theology Company Proprietary Limited ACN 097 887 075 ABN 74 097 887 075 Copyright 2000-2020 © Jeffrey Nicholls