Notes
Sunday 26 March 2023 - Saturday 18 March
[Notebook: DB 88 Salvation]
[page 351]
Sunday 26 March 2023
cc24_chromodynamics,html
Nymphomaniac II: ' The Western Church is the Church of suffering and the Eastern Church the Church of happiness.' Nymphomaniac (film) - Wikipedia
Monday 27 March 2023
Tuesday 28 March 2023
Production affected by domestic problems with discuptive tenants.
What have I got to say on the chromodynamics page? (page 24: Quantum chromodynamics: QCD). Plod along with the introduction and history and then atempt to make a criticism of the current theory in the light of my placement of Hilbert space prior to Minkowski space and find some light on asymptotic freedom from this point of view. We are looking at a network of three quarks and three gluons inside a hadron and trying to find a cause of asymptotic freedom which does not depend on renormalization and take advantage of the Turing vacuum introduced on page 23: Quantum field theory This seems to be impossible, but I like to relax myself by feeling that another month spent perfecting pages 23, 24 and 25
[page 352]
would be well spent. Now may be the time to send page 22_gravitation to Rovelli [who, it seems, has no time to listen].
Wednesday 29 March 2023
Some points for cc24_chromodynamics from Wilczek The Lightnesss of Being. Frank Wilczek (2008): The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces
Wilczek page 1, Part I: The Origin of Mass: 'Matter is not what it appears to be . . . [a persistent refrain from the physics popularizers, see Rovelli ref below] The mass of ordinary matter is the embodied energy of the basic building blocks, themselves lacking mass. Nor is space what it appears to be . . . [it] is revealed in our minds as a compolexc mechanism full of spontaneous activity'. See Wilczek page 109: total [computed density of universe as a factor of its observed density 1044 → 10100+ or so, the cosmological constsant problem, pure theoretical rubbish.
page 4: 'Devices to enhance our senses reveal a richer world . . . but the ultimate sense-enhancing device is the thinking mind' or an uncontrolled imagination.
page 6: 'The deep strucutre of the world is quite different from its surface structure.' The physicists are as far off as the theologians.
page 9: 'The scientific soul of matter, its irreducible essence, was mass'.
The new theory sees a world based on a multiplicity of space filling ethers, a totality I call the Grid. The new world model is extremely strange, but also extremely successful and
[page 353]
and accurate ' to the order of 10±50 [See also Carlo Rovelli (2017): Reality is Not What it Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity]
Wilczek page 12: Zeroth Law: the consiervation of mass = no mass no matter.
page 16: E = mc2
page 19: Dirac: ' "I play with equations" ' ie numerical equivalences.
page 20: 'Energy more central that mass', action more central than energy.
page 22: 'dark matter' not radiating, not vsible, just energy.
page 27: Nuclei are hard to observe, SLAC, LEP
page 28: 'strange new ideas' [?]
page 30: Hadrons, composite particles.
page 33: 'Quarks and gluons are embodied ideas': Landauer, Information is physical - mathematically complete and perfect objects. Rolf Landauer (1999): Information is a Physical Entity
page 35: Mesons and baryons, Quarks 3 flavours x 3 colours = 9 quarks.
page 36: Quarks : hadrons :: elecrons : atoms. Electronic spectra ⇆ hadron masses.
page 38: No isolated quarks.
SLAC electrons → virtual photons → flow of energy and momentum.
page 41: Spatial contraction and time dilation.
page 43: Uncerainty - limited resolution; certainty from group logical structure: the complete group of possibiities remains the same.
page 46: Many measurements of energy and momentum provde precision in place and time - Hilbert space is virtual, ie kinematic,
page 47: How do you see virtual particles? They have no momentum. The same arbitrary fiction as the cosmological constant.
[page 354]
Wilczek page 47 (cont): Screening.
page 48: Diagram of sceening
page 50: Antiscreening = asyptotic freedom. This book is as stupid as Rovelli!
Antiscreening seems very ad hoc? The ideas built around the renormalizastion of Yang-Mills theory by Veltman and 'tHooft. Yang-Mills theory - Wikipedia, Martinus J G Veltman: Nobel Lecture 1999: From weak interactions to gravitation, Gerardus 't Hooft (1999): Nobel Lecture 1999: A Confrontation with Infinity
page 73: "The Grid": 'What we perceive as empty space is really a powerful medium whose activity moulds the world ' and yet we do not feel it and it is complete arbitrary fiction as the cosmological constant problem illustrates. Wilczek builds all this on his misunderstanding of what it going o in the hadron world. I just have to put my finger on it in a 2000 word summary of his book, say the last 3 but one sections of cc24_chromodynamics [hence all these notes].
page 76: contact, vs page 77 Newton's action at a distance, ie gravitation: ideal contact.
Thursday 30 March 2023
Feynman + cosmological constant.
page 85: ' Theories consistent with special relativity must be field theories' [? individual particles exist in Minkowski space].
page 86: c is a feature of the Minkowski metric, ie the sructure of space. (page 12: The quantum creation of Minkowski space). The argument for field is a bit dodgy. A light beam is in fact a swarm of particles each having an individual arrival time and an individual effect upon its annihilation. Averaging them into a field using the law of large numbers may be unphysial.
[page 365]
Computing the 'summed influence' requires accounting for each particle.
page 89: 'interaction with a virtual electon-positron pair. Slippery customers these virtual particles, cooked up by treating units of measurement as dynamic rather than kinetmatic logical principles.
'complicated, small but very specific modifications of the force that you would calculate from Maxwell's equations'.
page 90: grid of layered ethers through which we can move in inertial motion giving the eternal orbit of the Moon (modified by the [dissipative] flexibility of the Earth and Moon, not rigid bodies). 'Material ether = condensate. The time is coming for me to get into arguentative / assertive mode. To Rovelli: 'In other words you ignore my ideas at your peril because you and your fellow quantum gravtiationista are WRONG (I think).
page 91: 'Chiral asymmetry breaking condensate' QQ quark - antiquark (zero sum, bifurcants) - 'perfectly empty space is unstable' σ mesons: 'Perftectly empty space is an explosive environment because the formation and binding of QQ mesons creates energy (he says). In my book we explain the origin of particles by a non-explosive interaction between quantum structures and gravitational potential. Chiral symmetry breaking - Wikipedia
page 92: Nothing → quark + antiquark + energy. Says it fits equation. Evidence: π mesons, vibrating QQ σ mesons?
page 93: Heavy Ion Collider Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider - Wikipedia
[page 356]
page 95: W + Z gain mass by superconductivity - photons slowed and made massive in a superconductor (?)
page 96: W + Z superconductor — empty space (?) Higgs condensate (?)
page 97: Empty space is multilayered multicoloured superconductor [of W + Z ?] ? Metric field - "Mother of all Grids".
pages 99-101: Wilczek is a 'field man' and so profoundly mistaken, though we can imagine a network as a sort of field with non-local connections. 'Consistency requires the metric field to be a quantum field [?]' (see above Wilczek page 85).
Friday 31 March 2023
Wilczek and Rovelli (not to mention the likes of Deutsch and all the other ones who seem to be able to ignore the cosmological constant problem) show me how far off from reality the higher echelons of theoretical physics are. Ignoring Feynman's idea that physics must begin with a realistic picture. Mathematical precision and equations count for very little when the methodology allows indefinite fudge factors (Add to these Streater and Wightman). As ever, press on. Streater & Wightman (2000): PCT, Spin, Statistics and All That
Wilczek 102: 'What Eistein meant is that it is hard to imagine how the physical world would function without the metric field. Light would not know which way to move or how fast.'
[page 351]
This question is taken care of by the constitutive role of light in the Minkowski metric on page 12: The quantum creation of Minkowski space.
Wilczek page 103: 'We have to let our concepts and equations take us where they will' but there is nothing to say that they are not totally on the wrong track. So he quotes Hertz (writing before Wigner) 'one cannot escape the feelibg that there mathematical formulae have an independent existence and an intlligence of their own'. In fact they have an embedded existence, a product of evolution and selection by survival which has brought a logically constrained (confined) universe to its present state. They tell us nothing more about the world than the statistics of a census tell us about a human culture.
page 104: 'The existence of the past depends on the existence of minds.' Silly, the past is everywhere in the present made possible by null geodesics [and other stable systems].
page 105: '. . . the most recent astronomical discovery that the Grid weighs — that the entity we perceive as space has a universal, non-zero density — crowns the case for physical reality. The concept of grid density is essentialy the same as Einstein's cosmological term, which is essentially the same as dark energy.'
page 106: 'Beause mass density and pressure have the same value everywhere, they can be regarded as intrinsic properties of space itself. That's the Grid viewpoint.'
page 107: 'Well tempered equation:' ρ = p / c2
[page 358]
Wilczek: 'well tempered equation' consistent with boost symmmetry of special relativity, ' claiming 'density of well-tempered Grid stays constsant' (do we believe this, based on the notion that a well tempered Grid gives us negative pressure p = − ρc2).
page 109: 'pressure affects the rate at which the universe is expanding.' Here [he documents that] the cosmological constant discrepancies between theory and measurement cover the range of 1044 → 10112 → ∞.
page 110: 'Maybe there is some important gap in our understanding of how gravity responds to Grid density.' Maybe the whole story of Grids and vacuums is wrong, mistaking virtual mathematical ideals for reality. He shows no connection with quantum theory, superposition and evolution. Whose fantasies are wilder? I will go with mine which has a deep root in history.
page 112: Computing matter: 'We try to find mathematical structures that mirror reality . . . By achieving such a correspondence, we can put reaality in a form we can manipulate with our minds.' Any faithful representation will do, not necessarily mathematical.
page 113: 'The algorithms of QCD empower us to program computers to churn out protons . . . '. So achieving 'Mass without mass': u and d quarks weight about 1% of the proton.
[Computation] 107 sec at 1012 flops mimics proton for 10-24 sec, say 1043 times slower. Why? Representing complex continuous algorithms numerically rather than symbolically? Knuth page v. Semi numerival computations are at the borderline between numerical and
[page 359]
symbolic. We might guess that the hadrons work symbolically. Donald E. Knuth (1981): The Art of Computer Programming
Wilczek page 114: 'quantum reality is really big.'
page 118: Multiplication of states by permutation and combination.
page 119: Laplace demon.
page 120: All this talk of complexity in computation hides the fact that the world is relatively simple and predictable at the classical scale.
page 121: Maybe the digital nature of quantum logic, dealing only in selected eigenvslues, makes the world very precise, ie atomic spectra may be become naturally defined with absolute precision by the symbolic interpretation of states which we decompose into high dimensional matrices which take a lot of computation to extract eigenvalues.
page 122: Creutz - Lattice of point [The use of lattice in Minkowski space seems to indicate a misunderstanding about the relationship between Hilbert and Minkowski spaces]. page 123: Variation and selection. Michel Creutz (1983): Quarks Gluons and Lattices
page 124: QCD determined by a small set of parameters: mass for each quark and one coupling strenth. Here we can apply Chaitin's version of Gödel's theorem, ie [cybernetic] requisite variety [to indicate that the enormous amount of computation needed to understand a hadron is grossly superfluous since a small input to a computation cannot generate a larger output]. Gregory J. Chaitin (1982): Gödel's Theorem and Information
pages 125, 127: 'the greastest scientific achievement of all time!' [maybe the greatest feat of measurment accompanied by the worst line of explanation].
page 128: The Origin of Mass. He says mass arises from the motion arising from quantum uncertainty [this seems to be the fundamental error in field theory].
page 136: 'Because if [a theory] is approximately right and can't be changed, it must be exactly right.' ?
page 138: 'ambition to make precise mathematical world models and faith that one could succeed, was the decisive inxshaustble Scientific Revolution [led astray by numerical calculation, overlooking the fact that the heart of mathematics (and the universe) is logical computaation and proof].
[page 360]
Wilczek page 139: Data Compression
page 140: Compression exploits symmetry and uses algorithmic informßation theory. Algorithmic information theory - Wikipedia
page 141: Particles and [other] stable systems are 'infinte loops' in the Turing vacuum.
page 143: Feebleness of gravity
page 149: Coupling: Gravitation, no teeth, no quanta, negligible coupling. EM, teeth, quanta, powerful coupling. The difference between cogs and belts.
page 150: Photon is like a gear because for a photon the interval between electrically charged particles is zero. So, he says, the answer is to deny the feeblness of gravitation, which leads us into a lot of silly stuff. So . . .
page 151: [Like] 'Why are protons so light?'
page 153: 'It takes energy to localize quarks' [we thought it was momentum. Δx.Δp ≈ h]. So, he says, proton mass arises from 'non completely cancelled' disturbance in gluon fields and not quite completely localized positions of quarks. Ie, we are repeating the cosmological constsant problem and treating uncerainty as a dynamic principle rather than a formal geometric pixellization. 'In this account the newest and trickiest element is the way the disturbance in the gluon field grows with distasnce [antiscreening?].
page 154: Planck units: page 155: Absolute units derive , page 156, from c, G, h [does this hocus pocus actually mean anything?].
page 157 c relates space to time, h relates time to energy, G measures curvature of space.
page 158: 'proton mass is very small in Planck units.'
[page 361]
Saturday 1 April 2023
Wilczek page 159: 'seed strong force' between quarks measured in Planck units is 1/25: 'We've overcome a major obstacle blocking the path toward a unified theory of forces' by fiddling with units rather than saying anything about reality. 'Pretty story'.
page 162: Part III Is Beauty Truth?
page 163: None of this tale can be verified because energies and momenta in the 'Planck regime' are far beyond any possible experimental realization.
page 164: Standard Model 'summarizes .. . almost everything we know about the fundamental laws of physics,' Standard Model is the Core theory.
page 165: 'The Core is Nature's last word' [you wish!].
page 166: Core: QED, QCD, Weak Interaction morphs differet flavours of quarks into one another: u → d changes proton into neutron.
page 167: Weakness of gravity (?). Neutrinos have mass (very small, very little interaction).
page 168: Masses and mixing of gauge bosons — 1. gluons; 2 W±; hypercharge B0.
page 169: Massless combination of W0 and B0 is the phton. Z boson + photon?. Masses and mixing of quarks and leptoms, 3 familites.,'All these particles would be massless. Why the families? Inefficient algorithms?
page 170: Parity violation, Lee, Yang, Wu. Chen Ning Yang & Tsung-Dao Lee: The Nobel Prize in Physics 1957, Wu Experiment - Wikipedia <./p>
page 171: Summary of Core (see vague figure 17.1, page 164)
page 172: 'Core . . . great achievement summing up centuries of briilliant work.' Experimentally correct, but arbitrary fiction based on the vacuum that is demolished by the cosmological constant problem.
[page 363]
page 172: (cont) 'The core contains the seeds of its own transcendence.' [?]
page 173: 'master symmetry' SO(10). Rotations in 10D space (Unitarity is rotation in ℵ0 dimensional space, covering all possible Turing machines. Fig 17.2 page 165: Charge account where all the fundamental particles can be transformed into one another.
page 174: 'both a particlse and an antiparticles are excitations of the same field.'
page 175: Invisible "N" particle that gives mass to the neutrino. 'The Charge Account maps the mathematically ideal to the physically real.' which may be where the trouble lies.
page 177: A problem: If strong, weak and EM are all aspects of a common master force they should all have the same strength. Why? Who knows.
page 179: Again: 'A great lesson from the Core is that the entity we perceive as empty space is in reality a dynamic medium full of structure and activity [eg the world].
page 180: 'To get down to basics we need to transfer impossible amounts of energy.'
page 185: Unififcation loves SUSY: Maxwell added dE/dt → magnetism.
page 186: Dirac equation → positron.
page 187: So equations may predict new particles, new software processes) - So now we have supersymmetry intoducing new dimensions: 'quantum dimensions'. New spins.
page 188: 'Supersymmetry leads us to double the number of fields, which must be heavier than their observed siblings.'
[page 363]
Wilczek page 189-190: Screening and antiscreening is a 'subtle quantum mechanical effect.'
page 191: 'From well outside the known universe, the universal power of gravity descends to join the other interactions pretty nearly.'
page 192: Chapter 21: Anticipating a New Golden Age. Hopeful leaps of imagination basically wrong by 1040+.
page 193: LHC 'born out of curiosity' and yielded almost nothing [much] but detailed information for the weapon industry. Large Hadron Collider - Wikipedia
page 194: Higgs found, SUSY particles not.
page 195: 'Core's compact yet remarkably complete and accurate account of the basic laws of matter crowned centuries of work.' - Dark Matter.
page 196: Is lightest SUSY particle dark matter?
page 197: 'axions' 'Quantum fluctuations – virtual particles – that reach these extraordinary energies are extremely rare but they do occur.'
page 198: Neutrinos acquire mass (yes). Protons should decay (seems unlikely).
page 199: Epilogue: ' Through patchy clouds, off in the distance, we seem to glimpse a mathematical paradise'.
page 200: Mass
page 201: Higgs field is more fundamental that the particle enables us to implement our vision of a universal cosmic superconductor and embodies the beautiful concept of spontaneous symetry breaking.
page 202: We only understand the origin of mass in hadrons [but aything with mass will have internal process].
[page 364]
Wilczek page 203: Dark matter and energy: quantum ideal without eigenvalues? Dark energy exerts negative pressure: force has no role in general relativity [but W is always talking about force?] More 'heroic' experiments to test for axions.
page 204: 'I've shown you my choicest smooth pebble, my prettiest shell and an undiscovered ocean [which I have discovered]. I hope you've enjoyed them. After all, they're our world.' The data is good, the theory is uncontrolled imagination both in physics and theology.
page 211: Appendix B: The Multilayered, Multicoloured Cosmic Superconductor. Meissner effect - magnetic field cannot penerate, since current flow is generated to oppose magnetism. He says Meissner effect causes supercoductivity, but the opposite is also true, an application of Maxwell's equation. Meissner effect - Wikipediapage 212: Grid: Electric and magnetic forecs result from the interplay between charged sources and virtual photons, aka field fluctuations. He claims photons are heavy in a superconductor??
page 213: So W + Z are heavy photons in a superconductor (he says). What is really important about W and Z is what they do, not their mass, ie there formal identity as units of embodied software (Landauer).
page 214: Cooper pairs = bosons
page 215: 'With more symmetry you have more possibilities for transformations [and spheres have the most] . . . '
page 217: Appendix C: From "not wrong" to (maybe) right. 'Supersymetry is too good for this world'. Symmetry breaking: which side of the road?
[page 365]
Wilczek page 250: 'strategically ignore glaring prolems' like the cosmological constant problem [again]. The core of the problem with Wilczek and physics in general is the idea that quantum fluctuations drive the world. No, it is the bifurfation into dyamic asd potential energy, Minkowski space and gravitation.
What we need is a new Turing like model of asymptotic freedom which may have some similarity to the role of the velocity of light and the generation of Minkowski space. This will be my gem, and throw out all the renormalization and screening and antiscreening on the basis that all actual communications betwen sources are one to one, computable and in all cases (other than gravitation) involve a code.
My little bits of depression (and reading all the bullshit in Wilczek's book is very depressing) can be remedied by looking at the beauty of the divine world (walking along the Torrens today) and trying to explain it reassonably rather than sticking to ancient the misunderstandings which are so deeply embedded in theology and physics.
Wilczek and the physics trade all believe that the world was made like this and it is their job to work out what the maker had in mind. The problem is different if we assume that there was a simple but powerful initial singularity which has made itself into the current world. One thing implicated in this view is the heuristc of simplicity which says that the initial stages must be very simple and easily understood (Page 25 principle 2: The heuristic of simplicity).