Notes
Sunday 24 September 2023 - Saturday 30 September 2023
[page 263]
Sunday 24 September 2023
What have I got? room full of books, all of which have left traces in my mind, trying to asemble the result into a new theology a bit too radical to work. I must keep going, following the wood heap analogy (see Notes, 2009, November 1) until I come to a consistent picture. Going to hear Haydn's glorification of Christianity today and wondering how my reality can compete with the dreams of a genius deceived by a false cultural milieu which has selected him for eternity. The evolutionary paradigm demands results. Can I do that? I must appeal to a significant proportion many of whom depend for their existence and meaning on the old story. In my book I have to gloss over the details and highlight the dream without compromising my idea of the truth. It all comes down to the interface between the collective consciousness (shaped by art) and the reality, shaped by "God".The Creation (Haydn) - Wikipedia
I am not looking for followers but for a truth that
[page 264]
appeals to me given all that I have absorbed over the last 80 years. I am happily stuck with my own reality, even though I still think that I have 20 years to get where I am going. I am very half finished, like most of my messy life, a bit of a personal wilderness.
Handl, Balanchine, Tchaikovsly, Jewels. Balanchine, Mariinsky, Stravinsky: Jewels, Rubies
Ethics decides where we put our energy, and gravitation gives energy to those structures that quantum mechanics selects in some way to be perfect, consistent, stable, like the electrons of an atom or the quarks and gluons of a hadron. I have been waiting to say this for so long and it has finally come out, a sentence which is an example of what it is trying to say, something meaningful and ethical enough to put energy into.
Can we make this into an ethical principle: only put energy into perfect action? In the singularity quantum perfection attracts gravitational energy. New principle: ethical roots.
Monday 25 September 2023
What I might like to see is that the fundamental symmetry / ethical principle in the world is the constancy of the velocity of light which lies at the root of the existence of spacetime which I would like to see as the operating system of the Universe. c and h are in some way the fixed points of everything. Where do G and kB fit in? We have to relate these to the boundaries of the formal universe established by Turing and Gödel, something that has been rattling around in my head since time immemorial (vis a vis me).
h, via Shannon, guarantees error free communication and stability. c, via null geodesics, makes spacetime compatible with quantum mechanics, h enables the existence of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues. c enables quantum mechanics to be compatible with spacetime at the cost of delay.
The quantum is the certainty principle not the uncertainty principle. Continuity ≡ no information ≡ no certainty (gravitation).
The Universe has kept itself on the right track since the beginning by natural selection so we need to understand the foundation at the very beginning since even if it was wrong at the beginning it has corrected itself by death, ie by things being selected out [it is self healing, what does not work does not exist]. We see the same in the human world where people who start off well [sometimes] fuck up and get eliminated. Look at the football.
[page 266]
Death is the saviour of everything. I take heart from having had a bad start and a couple of decades left to get myself and the rest of you on the right track.
So the operating system works by selection. If it does not work, it is not selected. Random input means that it tries everything. In other words evolution is foolproof and endlessly creative. We do not have to find a magic solution. Sometimes I feel that I try to hard to find solutions that I do not need. We can leave it to natural selection, but the interest of science is to find out how things like photosynthesis are done. Asmit Bhowmick et al (2023): Structural evidence for intermediates during O2 formation in photosystem II
Hitler's Thousand Year Reich lasted [12] years because evolution is foolproof. Systems that do not fit their environment are selected out and the quicker the selection the smaller the damage. Gravitation realizes possibility. Nazi Germany - Wikipedia
Minkowski space is the controller and operating system because dynamic selection occurs in real space. This answers the problem of assigning the role of operating system to space-time.
Tuesday 26 September 2023
Good morning self. My faith in the foolproofness of evolution grows as it becomes more obvious to me as the only way to build a universe. While I have had the idea of omnipotent ignorance for a long
[page 267]
tine nobody at Adelaide U even seemed to notice it because they are basically immersed in the Christian omnipotent omniscient god model (like the Catholic Church and the physics industry). An alternative was unthinkable to them, and of course, being myself, I was very tentative with the idea, but now it is putting on a bit of weight and learning to walk and its future is looking slightly rosy.
The difficulty lies in the need for memory to make evolution work so that it can build on previous success. It continues to amaze me that it takes me so long to understand the problems I face, like cc17_gravitation. I have been stuck on cc20_memory since about 6 September without really noticing how crucial it is to the evolutionary picture. Now maybe I know its place and can go ahead. Like inventing the wheel the idea is hidden in the mists of possibility and only emerges by chance, which emphasizes the importance of attributing ignorance to the divinity to give chance free reign.
The photon is the first bud and the first memory of the Universe acting like DNA to carry quantum states from generation to generation, maintaining, for instance the structure of the atom.
Wednesday 27 September 2023
Nearly finished cc20_memory.
next c25_principles
Reading QED. Is everything I think wrong? I say photons move on a null geodesic and outside time, so how do they have frequency and interfere with one another? They only interfere with themselves and their interference is in Hilbert space outside space and time, where there is no space and time. How do I get my head around this? Same as two slit experiment. Electron goes through both slits, ie Hilbert space associated with electron goes through both slits because it is outside spacetime. Read Bell. Every time I think I am getting somewhere I get stuck [reliving the history of quantum theory??]. The Thomas Aquinas straw feeling strikes. So go off into 'displacement activity' [read the news]. , Richard P Feynman (1988): QED: The Strange Story of Light and Matter, John S Bell (1987): Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics
Hilbert music is the foundation of the Universe. Feynman's path integral filters the music out of the noise. So we try to build a theology / physics on Hilbert space culminating in QCD? Extending from there to the transfinite musical network universe, since all music and computation is a concatenation of operators mapping Hilbert space onto itself and then Minkowski space onto itself which gives gravitation. Richard P Feynman (1965): Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals
Infinitely ambtious, hopelessly incompetent, but forging ahead into the darkness with a rewrite of the principles.
[page 269]
The creative power of Hilbert space is that it is algebraically complete.
Thursday 28 September 2023
Perhaps Parmenides and Plato were imagining the primordial Hilbert space. Every new idea brings new hope and we take Hilbert space to be the complete function space of ideas and the source of possible knowledge and reality beginning very simple with the initial singularity. The independence of Hilbert and Minkowski space is giving us a new picture of spirits (angels) and matter (us, mind and body), the body equipped with the means to reproduce the mind beginning with the original body / mind, the initial singularity, the beginning of the story, the eternal creator.
The interiors of all the particles are outside spacetime [in Hilbert space].
The enormous power of evolution is demonstrated by the enormous variety of life demonstrated in the programs of David Attenborough. David Attenborough (2011): Flying Monsters
In the struggle for a clear distinction between the Hilbert world and the Minkowski world an important observation is that Hilbert entanglement cannot be used to transmit information because [we have] no causal control of the input in order to control the output. In the Minkowski world observations give us definite symbols that are physical
[page 270]
that can be transmitted by physical means, eg electrical potentials. Once we get this clear we have a clear distinction between variation in spirit and definite information in matter. Somehow I feel that this idea, if it can be clarified, will eliminate a lot of the problems in quantum field theory.
Ie quantum mechanics describes the creativity of spirit, Minkowski describes the certainty of matter, physical information vs spiritual variation [imagination]. The mathematical ideal [imagined deterministic analogue process] makes quantum evolution deterministic, but maybe [it is not].
Friday 29 September 2023
We are very adaptable [both young physicists and young monks]. One only knows how badly one has been treated when the bad treatment ends. I grew up in a painful world of an evil deity surrounded by a harem of devils and I accepted it all because I was told that my performance in this vale of tears would determine the level of bliss I was destined for in the next life, a post mortem life that is a totally false ancient fantasy dreamed up by the dominant powers to pacify their victims. Vale of tears - Wikipedia
Inspired by Chanel Contos I began my book with this conclusion. My work is to create a heaven on earth by replacing
[page 271]
the old story with a new picture and this has occupied me day and night since fate decreed that I should enter the Dominican Order . . . more than 60 years ago. The breadth of my ambition stands in strong contrast to my ability which means that I cannot achieve the task alone, but my problem is that the 'standard model' is so deeply ingrained in our culture that people are inclined to laugh at my plans, tell me that my ambition is pointless and suggest that I do something more useful. I see no point in changing my way, however, and see that the need for change becomes more urgent as our conflicts between ourselves and with our planet become more intense. It seems that all that we have and are is a product of evolution, but the current model of evolution, red in tooth and claw, supports the general notion that competition and violence are essential components of our existence. The enormous power of cooperation is hidden in this view, which dates back to the ancient notion that matter is in some way evil and goodness resides in disembodied spirit. What is overlooked is the fact that matter embodies spirit, and that given the tiny size of the quantum of action, the 'spiritual density' of matter is enormous. Chanel Contos (2023): Consent Laid Bare
My problem, since my birth, has been Christianity. Christianity is built on a fundamental truth and a fundamental error
[page 272]
that mirror one another. The fundamental truth, captured in John's Gospel, is that the word was made flesh, that, in Landauer's terms, information in physical. The fundamental error is that the flesh is the enemy of the Word, [an idea introduced by the "apostle" Paul]. The ancient name for word is spirit and the ancient notion of spirit, built into Christianity by Plato and Aquinas, is that spirit ids immaterial, The truth is that matter, by its power of representation, is the carrier of spirit and the idea that there can be completely immaterial spirit in the heavens is dangerously and completely false. This gets my story down to a credible nutshell. Rolf Landauer (1999): Information is a physical entity, Paul, Romans 7:14-25: The war between the flesh and the spirit, Gospel of John (USCCB)
David Attenborough's nature programs give me a new and detailed exposition of the amazing power of evolution to solve the problems of life, reproduction, escape from predators and so on, developing exquisite sensors and very skilful means of movement, all detailed on an atomic and molecular scale from single celled creatures to massive trees, dinosaurs and whales.
What I need to do is to apply the ideas of evolution to the evolution of fundamental particles and bonded system of these particles by the combination of 'real time' Hilbert variation and real time Minkowski selection. Evolution is governed by conservation of energy (food) [, security] and reproduction.
Battle for the supremacy of the skies [Attenborough, if the predators eliminate the prey they will starve]. On the whole most of the food and energy comes from the plants, which comes from the Sun, which comes from thermonuclear interactions.
Work on the principle that we are all gods in a universe of gods and should live up to our reputation [because we need eachother].
What I am struggling to do is find my place in the Sun and my hope is to pull off a union of physics and theology via the theory of evolution. After c20_memory it is now necessary to use the memory to recursively build a Universe by exploring Cantor's generation of the transfinite numbers, harking back to Nicholls 1987. All I can do is steadily build up my case for logic and cognition, establish that information is physical and computation is real and mechanical but built on variation and selection. Slowly a picture will emerge of the sheer intellectual problem solving power of evolution emphasized by Attenborough but I think a too British account of violence when we learn about the enormous cooperative effort required to make multicellular bodies lie ourselves peaceful by having the standard genotype to put us all on the same page, internally among our constituent cells and externally between one another. The foundation of peace is shared reality. I must get my story into a form which I can preach. Jeffrey Nicholls (1987): A theory of Peace
[page 274]
I am trying to recover from the fundamental disaster in my life [a case of 20 years of systematic mental abuse]. I joined the Order of preachers whose motto is Veritas but it turned out to be an order of liars and ever since then I have been trying to get the story right. The key is loyal opposition. America is failing because the opposition is disloyal. The Church is failing because it kills any opposition, but I am not dead yet.
Saturday 30 September 2023
Evolution works because it continually clears the air [since] things that do not work simply fall out of existence, their matter (representative capital) is recycled and life goes on. This is why what little I have learned in these notes arises from my recognition of dead ends. The successes that arise from cooperation with reality are built on so we see slow progression towards amazing realities like the flight of insects and gene [memory] based reproduction, they key to it all.
Theory must eventually lead to policy. What is my policy? Scientific theology which means a union of physics and theology, to be announced in the book at the end of November (I hope).
The strangeness of quantum behaviour arises from the independence of Hilbert space.
[page 275]
What is the point of cc21_transfinity? A Cantorian explanation of the increase in the complexity of the world by an increase in material symbols, ie quanta of action, by deepening the gravitational potential well. We then turn to cc22_trans_minkowski [aka trans_hilbert], but this is just a duplicate of cc21 and what we really need to explain is the growing role of Hilbert space grown by the increase in complexity of Minkowski space so increasing the [widely distributed] creative bandwidth of Hilbert space and so making creativity smarter through increased variation? Sleepy time.
Barriers in spacetime are not barriers outside spacetime so even though particles may have boundaries in spacetime their Hilbert spaces, while coupled to them like the Hilbert space in the initial singularity, are nevertheless open to each other to form tensor products and so interact with each other. Photons and gluons have Hilbert spaces attached which can interact with one another, yielding eigenvalues and eigenvectors that appear in Minkowski space and determine what happens [does this make any sense? Is there just one Hilbert space for the whole Universe?].
We now have enough bits and pieces to start building a Universe, working in parallel with the old big bang version. We begin with the creative process of evolution, applying it to the quantum initial singularity which we have proposed as a calmer and more quantum friendly replacement for the [classical] big bang.
[page 276]
We imagine that the initial singularity creates a Hilbert space with a countable basis, maybe a fixed number of quanta of action enough to build a universe, representing the set of Turing computable functions.
I wish I could just catch the music in this. I am still carrying the load of Christian evil which I took on unconsciously from my mother in the Japanese war. I long for the light that really enlightens the world which I know is implicit in my physical theology if only I could get it clear.
Do I need a sacred text? This is the target for my book.
The full moon is magic [floating apparently unsupported through space].
I feel as though I have my story all down pat and then I begin to see objections.
It cannot be all that complicated given the simple starting point. So I love my interface of gravitation and quantum theory (page 17: Gravitation and quantum theory—in the beginning). The network idea gives the key to complexity starting in the flat Minkowski space of Turing machines all on the mass shell. This belongs to cc21_transfinity with Cantor and cognitive logical causality, all classical.
[page 277]
Then we go to the strangeness of Hilbert space in cc22_trans_hilbert and work with the quantum mechanical processes that underlie the classical world [bearing in mind the analogy between quantum mechanics and human interaction:
see page 14: "Measurement": the interface between Hilbert and Minkowski spaces, 14.3: This seems to be where Einstein missed the point of quantum theory. The principle of general covariance that helped him reach his field equation is based on the idea that observation has no influence on the system observed. This is not the case in quantum theory. The theory describes conversation, not dictation. The observed system does not dictate to the observer, it also listens.]
We take advantage of the fact that Fourier transformations are reversible and therefore entropy conserving and introduce quantum computation and communication and find that given the problems of measurement it is no more powerful than a Turing machine and that the set of Turing computable functions is equivalent to the set of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics, so mapping quantum computation onto the Turing vacuum ready for cc23_quantum_field_theory.
Then we use the cosmological constant problem to argue against the idea that quantum uncertainty creates energy and rephase QFT in terms of the Turing vacuum. The next step is to apply these ideas to confinement and asymptotic freedom in QCD, the long shot which brings it all home. As usual, I wish, but desire is the first step toward achievement.