Khinchin (1957), Aleksandr Yakovlevich, Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory (translated by P A Silvermann and M D Friedman), Dover 1957 Jacket: 'The first comprehensive introduction to information theory, this book places the work begun by Shannon and continued by McMillan, Feinstein and Khinchin on a rigorous mathematical basis. For the first time, mathematicians, statisticians, physicists, cyberneticists and communications engineers are offered a lucid, comprehensive introduction to this rapidly growing field.' 
Amazon   back

Khinchin (1960, 1998), Aleksandr Yakovlevich, The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Statistics, Dover 1998 'In the area of quantum statistics, I show that a rigorous mathematical basis of the computational formulas of statistical physics . . . may be obtained from an elementary application of the well-developed limit theorems of the theory of probability.' 
Amazon   back

Nicholls (2025), Jeffrey, Cognitive Cosmogenesis: A systematic unification of physics and theology, Austin Macauley Publishers 2025 ' This book is a personal narrative of those events and a defense of the belief that the universe itself is divine. The central argument is that by embracing this reality and abandoning notions of supernatural deities, humanity can resolve its problems. The universe, it is argued, is self-creating, and a proper understanding of physics leads to a plausible scientific theology. The natural intelligence inherent in the universe, from cellular organization to ecosystems, far surpasses any artificial intelligence. Comprehending this natural order, the author suggests, would make achieving world peace relatively straightforward. The book contends that modern theologians should recognize the physical world, rather than ancient texts, as the foundation for credible theology. It also addresses the historical entanglement of religion and politics, asserting that the model of creation presented herein fundamentally rejects the imperialistic ambitions that have fueled genocidal holy wars.'  
Amazon   back

Quigg (2013), Chris, Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions: Second Edition, Princeton UP 2013 ' This completely revised and updated graduate-level textbook is an ideal introduction to gauge theories and their applications to high-energy particle physics, and takes an in-depth look at two new laws of nature--quantum chromodynamics and the electroweak theory. From quantum electrodynamics through unified theories of the interactions among leptons and quarks, Chris Quigg examines the logic and structure behind gauge theories and the experimental underpinnings of today's theories. Quigg emphasizes how we know what we know, and in the era of the Large Hadron Collider, his insightful survey of the standard model and the next great questions for particle physics makes for compelling reading. The brand-new edition shows how the electroweak theory developed in conversation with experiment. Featuring a wide-ranging treatment of electroweak symmetry breaking, the physics of the Higgs boson, and the importance of the 1-TeV scale, the book moves beyond established knowledge and investigates the path toward unified theories of strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions. 
Amazon   back

Ronson (2026), Jon, The Castle: Adventures in a World of Unravelling Men, Viking Non Fiction 2026 ' From the million-copy bestselling author of The Psychopath Test comes a twisting, darkly comic true-life story about one man, his castle, a generation of unravelling men – and a secret hidden deep behind the castle walls.' 
Amazon   back

Alexander Howard (2026_09_13), It’s a strange time to be a man’: in The Castle, Jon Ronson investigates the plight of unanchored men, Review: The Castle: Adventures in a World of Unravelling Men by Jon Ronson (Viking Non Fiction) ' The ABC’s now-defunct current affairs show Q+A makes an early appearance in Jon Ronson’s The Castle: Adventures in a World of Unravelling Men.
A guest in 2024, he reflects on the show as “a delightful hour’s television with everyone being convivial to one another, no matter their politics”. That is, until there was a question about men, which he responded to with: “It’s a strange time to be a man.” He describes the response of host Patricia Karvelas (“Is it? Why?”) as the “sharpest exchange” of the program.
“I didn’t know what I meant by it at the time,” he writes. “It was a new thought for me.” He offered some quick remarks about the plight of everyday working men in deindustrialised towns and cities, everyone relaxed, and the moment passed. But he sensed there was something more to be said, “not least because so many people seemed nervous to broach it. For me, that uneasiness was a reason to head in".' back

Chen Yixin (2026_09_13), Fully build an artificial intelligence safety barrier Promote the healthy and orderly development of artificial intelligence, At present, artificial intelligence has led a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation to advance in depth, and the field of artificial intelligence has become the main battlefield of global scientific and technological competition and a new track for the strategic game of major countries. The Party Central Committee attaches great importance to the development of artificial intelligence, and General Secretary Xi Jinping made a series of important instructions, emphasizing that it is necessary to "comprehensively promote artificial intelligence scientific and technological innovation, industrial development and enabling application, improve the mechanism of artificial intelligence supervision system, and firmly grasp the initiative of artificial intelligence development and governance." We must deeply study the spirit of General Secretary Xi Jinping's important instructions, unswervingly implement the overall national security concept, accelerate the construction of an artificial intelligence security risk prevention and control system, and promote the healthy and orderly development of artificial intelligence in China with high-level safety and high-performance governance. back

Claude E Shannon (1948), A Mathematical Theory of Communication, '' The recent development of various methods of modulation such as PCM and PPM which exchange T bandwidth for signal-to-noise ratio has intensified the interest in a general theory of communication. A basis for such a theory is contained in the important papers of Nyquist1 and Hartley2 on this subject. In the present paper we will extend the theory to include a number of new factors, in particular the effect of noise in the channel, and the savings possible due to the statistical structure of the original message and due to the nature of the final destination of the information.
The fundamental problem of communication is that of reproducing at one point either exactly or approximately a message selected at another point. Frequently the messages have meaning; that is they refer to or are correlated according to some system with certain physical or conceptual entities. These semantic aspects of communication are irrelevant to the engineering problem. The significant aspect is that the actual message is one selected from a set of possible messages. [. . .]
Actually, two signals can be reliably distinguished if they differ by only a small amount, provided this difference is sustained over a long period of time. Each sample of the received signal then gives a small amount of statistical information concerning the transmitted signal; in combination, these statistical indications result in near certainty. back

Dennis Muller(2026_09_15), Bluster and betrayal: Paul Barry probes how steel tycoon Sanjeev Gupta hoodwinked the powerful, Review: The Big Steal: How Steel Tycoon Sanjeev Gupta fooled Australia and the World – Paul Barry (Allen & Unwin)
It is difficult to read Paul Barry’s The Big Steal without a mounting sense of outrage, not just at the British businessman Sanjeev Gupta, rightly described as a silver-tongued scoundrel, but at the greedy bankers, gullible journalists, naive politicians and incompetent regulators who allowed this global scam to happen.
The story has been meticulously put together by one of Australia’s finest investigative journalists. Barry knows the terrain of corporate skulduggery well, having written two books tracing the rise and fall of that infamous Western Australian pirate Alan Bond.
All the ingredients of the Bond story are present again, only on a global scale.
Basically Gupta’s scam worked like this. He would buy a rundown steelworks, aluminium smelter or power station in a town heavily dependent on it: Whyalla in South Australia, Uskmouth and Newport in Wales, Galati in Romania. Two dozen steelworks altogether across Britain, Europe, the US and Australia. (In a sad footnote, administrators this week decided to permanently shut down the blast furnace at the Whyalla steelworks, with around 500 jobs to be lost.)' back

Jason Bamburger (2026_09_17), OpenAI may have solved the Navier‑Stokes equation — but mathematics is more than $1 million trophy hunts, ' Last week, OpenAI shared a proposed solution to the “Navier-Stokes equation” — one of the seven renowned Millenium Prize Problems chosen by the Clay Mathematics Institute that have stumped mathematicians for many years.
Each of these problems offers a $1 million reward. If OpenAI’s solution is confirmed, this would make it only the second Millennium Prize Problem ever to be solved.
Good. I hope the Riemann hypothesis is the next problem conquered by AI.
I do not mean to convey that these famous open problems are silly or useless — in fact, the Millennium Prize Problems were chosen because of their mathematical importance. The Navier-Stokes equation describes how fluids such as water and air flow.
However, their cultural status has allowed them to grow far beyond their mathematical importance. They have become the monuments of our discipline. They were built for good reasons, are genuinely impressive, but are now obscuring the breadth of modern mathematics.[. . .]
Of course, great problems can produce great mathematics. Russian mathematician Grigori Perelman, for example, added crucial new ideas to Richard Hamilton’s theory of Ricci flow while solving the Poincaré conjecture — the only Millennium Prize Problem solved by humans. But if the value of these problems lies in the new theories, methods, and connections produced while trying to solve them, perhaps the solutions and the trophies have received too much cultural emphasis.' back

Jason Bamburger (2026_09_17), OpenAI may have solved the Navier‑Stokes equation — but mathematics is more than $1 million trophy hunts, ' Last week, OpenAI shared a proposed solution to the “Navier-Stokes equation” — one of the seven renowned Millenium Prize Problems chosen by the Clay Mathematics Institute that have stumped mathematicians for many years.
Each of these problems offers a $1 million reward. If OpenAI’s solution is confirmed, this would make it only the second Millennium Prize Problem ever to be solved.
Good. I hope the Riemann hypothesis is the next problem conquered by AI.
I do not mean to convey that these famous open problems are silly or useless — in fact, the Millennium Prize Problems were chosen because of their mathematical importance. The Navier-Stokes equation describes how fluids such as water and air flow.
However, their cultural status has allowed them to grow far beyond their mathematical importance. They have become the monuments of our discipline. They were built for good reasons, are genuinely impressive, but are now obscuring the breadth of modern mathematics.[. . .]
Of course, great problems can produce great mathematics. Russian mathematician Grigori Perelman, for example, added crucial new ideas to Richard Hamilton’s theory of Ricci flow while solving the Poincaré conjecture — the only Millennium Prize Problem solved by humans. But if the value of these problems lies in the new theories, methods, and connections produced while trying to solve them, perhaps the solutions and the trophies have received too much cultural emphasis.' back

Jeffrey Nicholls (1982_05), An essay on the divinity of money, 1 Western theological tradition conceives of god as a personal being other than the universe who creates and controls our lives. Our political system still (rather tenuously) recognises god as a source of law through royal assent and the use of oaths. Since god is believed to be other than the universe, it cannot be observed and so cannot be the subject of science as we now understand it. Our information about god comes from ancient texts revealed to chosen prophets and interpreted by churches with equally ancient roots.
2 The rise of science questioned revelation and the churches as sources of truth, but they have remained in existence because science still lacks the power to ask or answer the fundamental questions of life and death that concern theology.
3 Here I outline a new scientific theology whose model of god derives not from ancient text but from the mathematical theory of text and communication itself. I propose that this model describes the universe of our experience, which is therefore fittingly called god.
4 I then interpret this model using elements of current physical theory. These ideas are then applied to money.
5 The movement of money is an abstract representation of the the activity of society as a whole, just as the flow of momentum in space-time is an abstract representation of the physical universe. My hypothesis is that proper understanding and political control of public cashflows is necessary and sufficient to obtain peaceful civilisation.' back

Jeffrey Nicholls (1992a), An essay on value, ' 1: We must kill to live. The question before is is whether or not to kill some fraction of the old growth forest (OGF) in the Wingham management area (WMA) in order to keep the sawmilling operation at Mt George alive.
2: Religion: Although the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as we have it, is a document based largely on resource, commercial and employment considerations, I believe the Commission is facing a religious issue, and will have no peace until it realizes that fact.
3: Matters of life and death are questions of religion. For those who have power over life and death, deciding what to kill is a question of value. The value system of any organism is determined by the history of its survival.
4: If the decision is good, the benefit from killing will exceed the value of what is destroyed, yielding a profit and enhanced probability of survival. A wrong judgement of value leads to the opposite result.' back

John R. Heckman (2026_09_16), Russian team ‘misused’ Claude AI to train a killer drone on scraped Ukrainian war footage, ' A new threat intelligence report from the AI company Anthropic has revealed that a Russian team scraped Ukrainian combat videos to train an autonomous “kamikaze” drone to choose its own targets and destroy them.
Anthropic’s report was published on Sept. 10, two days before CEO and co-founder of the company, Dario Amodei, published an essay arguing that humanity must urgently “slow the pace” of AI development.A new threat intelligence report from the AI company Anthropic has revealed that a Russian team scraped Ukrainian combat videos to train an autonomous “kamikaze” drone to choose its own targets and destroy them.
Anthropic’s report was published on Sept. 10, two days before CEO and co-founder of the company, Dario Amodei, published an essay arguing that humanity must urgently “slow the pace” of AI development.
Read more: Cyber attacks? Bioterrorism? To ‘Pace the Frontier’ of AI effectively, we must improve our anticipatory thinking
The report is a 154-page account of the attempted misuse of Claude AI models for “malicious activity” between December 2025 and August 2026. It covers seven areas: cyber operations, influence operations, surveillance, scams and fraud, biological misuse, conventional weapons development and distillation.
One case, tracked as GTG-27005, describes a small, likely freelance team in Russia that used Claude’s coding tool to help build software for a swarm of autonomous first-person-view (FPV) “kamikaze” drones — the cheap, camera-guided munitions that have become one of the defining weapons of the war.
The report is a 154-page account of the attempted misuse of Claude AI models for “malicious activity” between December 2025 and August 2026. It covers seven areas: cyber operations, influence operations, surveillance, scams and fraud, biological misuse, conventional weapons development and distillation.
One case, tracked as GTG-27005, describes a small, likely freelance team in Russia that used Claude’s coding tool to help build software for a swarm of autonomous first-person-view (FPV) “kamikaze” drones — the cheap, camera-guided munitions that have become one of the defining weapons of the war. ' back

John von Neumann (1929_05_10), Proof of the Ergodic Theorem and the H-Theorem in Quantum Mechanics, ' Abstract It is shown how to resolve the apparent contradiction between the macroscopic approach of phase space and the validity of the uncertainty relations. The main notions of statistical mechanics are re-interpreted in a quantum-mechanical way, the ergodic theorem and the H-theorem are formulated and proven (without “assumptions of disorder”), followed by a discussion of the physical meaning of the mathematical conditions characterizing their domain of validity. [. . .]
The object of the present paper is the clarification of the relations between the macroscopic and the microscopic point of view of complex systems; that is, the discussion of the question why the known thermodynamic methods of statistical mechanics make it possible to make statements about incompletely (viz., only macroscopically) known systems that are correct most of the time. In particular, first, how the peculiar, seemingly irreversible behavior of entropy arises, and second, why the statistical properties of the (fictitious) micro-canonical ensemble can be attributed to the incompletely known (real) system.1 And these questions shall be attacked with the means of quantum mechanics. back

Joshua Black (2026_09_15), How does unthinkable policy become inevitable: the OvertonWindow is one possible-answer, ' Not that long ago, Australians owned many public enterprises and lived behind high tariff walls. The country ran on cheap coal-fired power. A pro-China foreign policy and a large, bipartisan migration program worked to the country’s benefit.
Today’s policy landscape would have been unimaginable to many voters 40 years ago. Most of the old state-owned enterprises now belong to shareholders. National Party leader Matt Canavan is a very lonely voice in his calls for renewed tariff protectionism.
In the face of global heating, Australia continues to experience social division over the future of its energy generation. The nation’s flagship defence policy to tackle regional uncertainty involves closer ties with old Anglosphere allies. And politicians of every hue are tying themselves in knots in a quest to lower net overseas migration.
How do policy cycles come to be, and what causes them to be remade over time? There’s a concept that could help us answer these questions: the Overton window. To borrow a concise definition from foreign policy expert Thomas Wright, the Overton window is the idea that there is an “acceptable range of political discourse in a society” at a given time. For example, it was once crazy-brave to argue for the end of the White Australia policy – until it wasn’t.
In democratic systems, leaders and parties tend to stick within these boundaries to remain popular and legitimate. [. . .]
At its most superficial, the Overton window can be deployed to explain every one of the twists and turns above. It can be made bigger or smaller, more progressive or more conservative.
The causes of change can be anything from a shocking event to a concerted campaign of advocacy, a singular act of individual political boldness or a longer, slower process of social and cultural change.
On closer inspection, there’s not much in the way of precise explanation for how change happens. The Overton window’s magic is its ability to absorb and repurpose other models of political change without ever naming or explaining them.[. . . ]
The Overton window draws its appeal from the idea that impactful think tanks, landmark reports and leading advocates are the real change agents. The rise of the concept closely tracked the rapid proliferation of think tanks from 1990 onwards. Such actors played a role in the national policy changes I referred to at the outset. And they’ve been major characters in the ETS story, too. [. . . ]
Media space and political opportunity are central to the Overton concept. Yet one doesn’t need a copy of The Communist Manifesto in their lap to appreciate that larger social and economic forces shape political change. Those forces are slower to materialise and harder to evaluate, but that makes them all the more important. ' back

Kurt Sengul & Jirdan McSwiney, Make ‘em laugh: how One Nation uses comedy to normalise harmful ideas, ' The political firestorm ignited by an episode of One Nation’s satirical animated series Please Explain was one of those rare moments in Australian politics that has brought together Labor, the Coalition, Greens and the crossbench.
The July episode “Don’t Be Hastie” depicted Western Australian Liberal frontbencher and former Australian Defence Force member Andrew Hastie. In it, he’s labelled a “traitor” for testifying against alleged war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith and supporting Labor’s “evil hate speech legislation”.
This sparked a fierce response from Hastie. He called Pauline Hanson and Barnaby Joyce “lying cowards” and demanding they delete the video or explain why he and other veterans are being called traitors.
The video also prompted a spirited response from Tasmanian senator and former soldier Jacqui Lambie. She described the episode as “absolutely disgusting” and called Hanson “nothing less than a bloody coward”.
While the Coalition has wobbled on how to respond to the unprecedented rise of One Nation, Hastie has been one of the few in the Liberal Party to take the fight directly to Hanson. But this episode reveals more than just a political scuffle. It provides a window into the role of humour in contemporary far-right politics. [. . .]
The intense and bipartisan reaction to the “Don’t Be Hastie” episode shows that while humour and satire can provide the far right with a shield from criticism and political backlash, that shield is not impenetrable.
Hanson doubled down, dismissing the reaction as a “storm in a teacup” and thanking Hastie for the added publicity. But her deputy leader, Barnaby Joyce, has distanced himself from the episode and apologised to Hastie.
Being seen to mock or denigrate Australian military veterans is dangerous territory for One Nation. Please Explain was commissioned at a time when One Nation was still a fringe minor party. The furore generated by the Hastie episode raises questions about whether the animated series is still fit for purpose.
While the cartoons have certainly helped One Nation spread its message to wide audiences, the irreverent and often deliberately offensive content may be out of step with Hanson and the party’s attempt to position themselves as a viable party of government.' ' back

Mark Ruffalo & Matt Stoller, The Oligarchs Are Starting to Lose Their Grip on Power, ' In 2023 the two of us, one a Hollywood actor and the other an antimonopoly policy analyst, met on a Zoom call during the Writers Guild strike. We came together because we recognized the root cause of the strike: A handful of corporations were swallowing an entire industry and leaving those who work in it worse off. Netflix, Amazon and Disney were accumulating power, combining their production capacity with their enormous distribution platforms to form what could quickly become the kind of oligopolistic entities not seen in Hollywood in decades.
On that Zoom call, we talked about the consequences of consolidation for the people who make movies and TV, as well as for audiences. Mark had starred in “I Know This Much Is True,” a 2020 mini-series about how America treats mental illness, and we both wondered: Would a show like that still be made if an entity like HBO, which will come under Paramount’s control as part of this merger, were no longer free to take these kinds of creative risks?
The same question applies to “Spotlight,” the Oscar-winning movie about corruption and pedophilia in the Catholic Church, which was produced by an independent studio. Competition and opportunities for brave storytelling are intrinsically related, and we both knew that having lots of competitive outlets to produce art and lots of paths to distribute it helps to ensure that riskier, more controversial films and TV shows keep getting made. [. . . ]
Hollywood has long put out important truth-telling films, from “All the President’s Men” to the documentary “Citizenfour.” Some of the most celebrated films and TV shows — such as “The Godfather,” “All in the Family” and “M*A*S*H” — explored daring, controversial themes. Much of this content was created when film and TV functioned through open markets involving separate studios, exhibitors and distributors. After the industry allowed widespread consolidation, streaming companies began to take over. If a studio like Warner Bros. ceases to exist as an independent entity, we will lose yet another company to fund, produce and distribute that kind of art.[. . . ]
We’ve seen what happens when monopoly-leaning companies benefit from a fear that silences dissent. But our growing coalition is demonstrating that when we don’t get stuck on the sidelines, don’t bow down to inevitability and join together to fight, we can win.' back

Matej Lipar et al., Subdued surface expression of deep cave collapse, ' Cave systems can be difficult to recognise where karst landforms are subdued or overprinted with other landscape processes. Subtle linear depressions on carbonate platforms are commonly interpreted as fluvial or tectonic landforms, but may also mark collapse above underlying cave systems. We test this on the Nullarbor Plain, southern Australia, a stable >200,000 km² carbonate platform exposed for >14 Myr. Integrating morphometrics, electrical resistivity tomography, passive seismic profiling, cave records, cliff exposures and sedimentology, we show that kilometre-scale, shallow, sediment-filled trenches are surface expressions of vertically propagated collapse and sagging above deep cave conduits. These depressions lack integrated drainage, downstream sediment transport and sedimentological evidence of channelised flow; instead, they overlie vertically extensive low-resistivity zones, align with mapped caves and collapse dolines, and project to cliff-face exposed stratal deformation. The Nullarbor trenches provide diagnostic criteria for recognising subdued cave-collapse systems on Earth and an analogue for interpreting linear depressions on other rocky planetary surfaces. back

Navier-Stokes equations - Wikipedia, Navier-Stokes equations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopeia, ' In physics, the Navier–Stokes equations are certain partial differential equations which describe the motion of viscous fluid substances, named after French engineer and physicist Claude-Louis Navier and Anglo-Irish physicist and mathematician George Gabriel Stokes. They were developed over several decades of progressively building the theories, from 1822 (Navier) to 1842–1850 (Stokes). The Navier–Stokes equations mathematically express conservation of momentum and conservation of mass for Newtonian fluids.' back

NSW Land and Environment Court (1994), Jeffrey Nicholls v Director General National Parks and Wildlife Service No. 10151 of 1994, NSW Land and Environment Court back

Precautionary principle - Wikipedia, Precautionary principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The precautionary principle (or precautionary approach) is a broad epistemological, philosophical and legal approach to innovations with potential for causing harm when extensive scientific knowledge on the matter is lacking. It emphasizes caution, pausing and review before leaping into new innovations that may prove disastrous. Critics argue that it is vague, self-cancelling, unscientific and an obstacle to progress. In an engineering context, the precautionary principle manifests itself as the factor of safety. It was apparently suggested, in civil engineering, by Belidor in 1729. Interrelation between safety factor and reliability is extensively studied by engineers and philosophers. The principle is often used by policy makers in situations where there is the possibility of harm from making a certain decision (e.g. taking a particular course of action) and conclusive evidence is not yet available. For example, a government may decide to limit or restrict the widespread release of a medicine or new technology until it has been thoroughly tested. The principle acknowledges that while the progress of science and technology has often brought great benefit to humanity, it has also contributed to the creation of new threats and risks. It implies that there is a social responsibility to protect the public from exposure to such harm, when scientific investigation has found a plausible risk. These protections should be relaxed only if further scientific findings emerge that provide sound evidence that no harm will result.' back

Ross Gittins (2026_09_16), Feeling the pinch? Blame the pay rise you didn’t get, ' I now realise that though everyone is free to say the rise in wages has been excessive, it is not done to say the reverse – that wage increases have been inadequate. Why not? Because the bosses wouldn’t like it. For that matter, nor would the unions thank me for pointing out their failure to do their jobs properly.
So I’m indebted to the Australia Institute’s Greg Jericho for being the country’s first economist to blow the whistle. He’s actually looked up the numbers and seen that, though businesses kept increasing their prices in the first two years following the COVID pandemic – March 2021 to March 2023 – the workers weren’t game to ask for a pay rise.
Since then, the system has got back to normal and wage rises have pretty much kept up with price rises. The need for some sort of catch-up was forgotten.
As a result, by March 2023, the purchasing power of everyone’s wage was cut by 5 per cent, and nothing’s been done to reduce that cut to people’s “real” wage.
Now do you wonder why balancing the household budget has become so much harder for so many people and why the economy is weak and getting weaker?
Jericho projects that, if things continue on their present path – that is, if there’s no recession – the purchasing power of wages won’t have returned to what it was in 2023 until the end of 2036. Wow. What an enticing prospect. Isn’t it great to be an Aussie!
When the nation’s worthies preach their sermons about the need for improved productivity, the big come-on for you and me is that an X per cent improvement allows an X per cent increase in wages without adding anything to inflation. How do you get a “real” increase in wages? By improving productivity.
But from now on, any increase in real wages will be used to make up for the pay rises foregone in 2021 and 2022. Again, the boss does a lot better out of this deal than the workers do.
What the bosses and economists don’t get – or don’t want to get – is that they’ve got productivity the wrong way around. They say, “give us an improvement in productivity and we’ll increase your wages”. But it works the other way: make employers increase wages, and they start looking for ways to improve the productivity of their workers, thereby cutting the cost of their labour. back

Sian Cain and agencies (2026_09_14), Israeli minister threatens to strip Israeli film-makers of citizenship over Gaza documentary NAZA, ' Israel’s culture minister has called for the Oscar-winning Israeli directors of NAZA, a documentary about the country’s mass killing of civilians in Gaza, to be stripped of their citizenship, accusing them of “treason against the state”. NAZA, which was produced by the Guardian, is named for an acronym used by Israel’s intelligence service to indicate how many civilians it expects to die in an airstrike on Gaza. In the film, the Israeli directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor spoke to 24 different Israeli military or intelligence whistleblowers who outlined the AI-powered targeting systems used to bombard Gaza that have killed tens of thousands of civilians. In one interview, a source claims that approval had been given to kill 500 NAZA in order to kill one Hamas member. The 80-minute documentary won a special jury prize at this year’s Venice film festival on Saturday, after receiving a 25-minute standing ovation – a festival record. back